Download

Sustainability-linked finance (SLF) offers a promising pathway to close the gap in corporate financing for climate change adaptation by linking borrowing costs to climate-resilience performance. However, current instruments fall short of their potential. Furthermore, private actors face a conundrum: how to price, prioritise and operationalise adaptation when climate risk is uncertain, future-oriented and poorly rewarded by markets.

This paper addresses that challenge by exploring how SLF can serve as an effective mechanism to realign financial incentives and unlock firm-level innovation in climate resilience.

Key points for decision-makers

  • The authors analyse 701 SLF instruments issued by 395 firms across real estate, electric utilities and agrifood and compare embedded key performance indicators (KPIs) with those disclosed in sustainability reports.
  • Across adaptation, resilience and combined ‘mitigation–adaptation–resilience’ (MAR) themes, firms report 2,619 relevant KPIs, yet only 511 (19.5%) are embedded in financial contracts, leaving 80.5% unenforced.
  • This fourfold gap highlights a significant opportunity to expand SLF coverage using metrics that firms already track.
  • The bottleneck is not data availability but a lack of standardised, verifiable adaptation and resilience benchmarks.
  • The authors propose a suite of process-based KPIs and contractual mechanisms to bridge the gap, to enable SLF to evolve into a credible, scalable tool for embedding climate resilience into corporate strategy and unlock private capital for adaptation.
  • The study provides the first comprehensive mapping of how adaptation and resilience metrics are embedded or omitted in SLF instruments.

Keep in touch with the Grantham Research Institute at LSE
Sign up to our newsletters and get the latest analysis, research, commentary and details of upcoming events.