Paola Zapata Martin (MSc Philosophy of Economics and the Social Sciences)

Why did you choose LSE and the programme?
I chose the LSE because of its unique position at the intersection of rigorous academic research and real-world policy debate. During my undergraduate studies I was particularly interested in the gap between economic theory and practice, and both the LSE and the programme offered exactly the kind of intellectual environment where I could examine that divide more critically.
Which aspects of your studies were the most beneficial for your professional as well as personal development?
The most beneficial aspect of my studies has been the analytical toolkit the programme has given me. It has taught me how to think more carefully, question assumptions and build stronger arguments. Professionally, this has made me more confident in dealing with ambiguity and complex problems. Personally, it has made me a more reflective thinker who can better engage with different perspectives and unfamiliar ideas.
What is your fondest memory of your time here?
My fondest memory is the end-of-term dissertation presentations. It was incredibly rewarding to see everyone’s ideas and work come together after months of research and discussion. Those presentations really demonstrated the strength of the cohort and the richness of the programme by bringing together a wide range of original and engaging projects.
Why would you recommend studying at LSE and the Philosophy department in particular?
I would recommend studying at the LSE because it combines academic excellence with a real connection to the world beyond the lecture hall. The Philosophy department in particular is outstanding. The teaching is rigorous, the professors are incredibly knowledgeable and supportive, and the department is hands-on and genuinely invested in student development.
Your LSE experience in your own words.
My LSE experience has been deeply inspiring. It has introduced me to new philosophical debates, strengthened my academic confidence and encouraged me to consider pursuing a PhD in the field.
Most importantly, I was surrounded by passionate peers who brought energy and curiosity to every discussion. It was certainly an intellectual environment that constantly pushed me to aim higher.