
About
I joined the LSE as an Assistant Professor in 2019, and I have been the Director of the LSE’s Mannheim Centre for Criminology since 2024. My chief interests lie in the origins, applications, and limitations of the movement to pin criminal justice to robust science — what in some circles is called ‘evidence-based’ justice reform.
Origins: In one line of research, I trace the progressive history of scientifically-informed criminal justice policy. Since their earliest years, criminologists have argued that criminal justice policy ought to rest on sound evidence. I study what lessons we can take from how that case has been presented, and what its policy effects have been.
Applications: In my second line of research, I evaluate the steps that could be taken to align criminal justice more closely with evidence-based principles. To that end, in my recent work I help identify which interventions are most likely to yield desired results, and I appraise the extent to which current practice rests on — or departs from — the policies we believe promise those results.
Limitations: In my third line of research, I study what the call for evidence-based policy does for us, and also what it does to us. Although basing social policy on good science holds intuitive appeal, that policy stance also provokes thorny — and deeply consequential — questions about what kind of criminal justice we want, what we’re likely to get, and how we’ll get it. I analyse the potential of that policy stance, and also its perils.
These themes coalesce in a book project on the historical sociology of evidence-based criminal justice policy reform in the UK and the US.
If you’re passing by the Social Policy department and my office door is open, then please feel free to stop in and say hello!
Publications

A meta-evaluative synthesis of the effects of custodial and community-based offender rehabilitation
Drawing together the evidence of correctional treatment effectiveness, we find that rehabilitation tends to produce large-yet-inconsistent effects when delivered in the community, and modest-yet-consistent effects when delivered in custody. That empirical insight motivates a theoretical trade-off between prioritising effect precision or effect size when seeking to deliver on rehabilitation's promises.31 Jan 2025
Settling institutional uncertainty: policing Chicago and New York, 1877–1923
Shows that Progressivism underpinned an expansive interpretation of the police role in the early years of the NYPD and Chicago Police Department. Finds that both departments ‘identified’ problems that they imagined themselves uniquely well equipped to solve and ‘authorized’ themselves with the capacities they deemed necessary to solve them. In a period of instability, the analysis shows how the police can steer answers to questions about the police role’s proper scope, and how far police powers should extend.31 Aug 2023
No results found
Teaching
Courses:
- SP373 Policing, Security and Globalisation
- SP473 Policing, Security and Globalisation
- SP477 Crime, Justice & Social Policy
- SP478 Special Issues in Criminology and Criminal Justice
Areas of supervision
I welcome applications from PhD candidates who would like to pursue a project using either quantitative or qualitative methods to study topics related to crime, justice, and social policy. Within that broad thematic focus, I’m on the lookout for projects that pose important and theoretically motivated questions, and that contain a feasible and rigorous plan for answering them. I especially welcome applicants with non-traditional backgrounds and from under-represented groups.
- Criminology
- Criminal justice
- Public Policy
- Social Policy
- Criminal Law
- Evidence-Based Policy
- Policy Analysis
Choosing a PhD Supervisor can be daunting, and the decision's high stakes tend to compound the challenge. To assist your deliberation, please consider two pieces of advice:
- First, read as much of a prospective supervisor’s recent scholarship as possible to acquire a sense of what they think about, and — just as importantly — how they approach the questions they pose. To assist you toward that end, my research is almost entirely publicly accessible through links available here. Please don’t hesitate to contact me if access to any published work proves a struggle.
- Second, my prior and current supervisees (please see their names below) are best qualified to describe how I aim to support students during the degree. They have generously agreed that prospective PhD applicants may consult them directly with questions about what a supervisorial relationship with me might look like, and its possible fit with your preferred learning style.
PhDs supervised:
- David Eichert (Dept Lecturer in International Relations, Oxford)
- Emma Louise Blondes (PhD in progress, LSE)



