Professor Kenneth Benoit

Professor Kenneth Benoit

Director of the Data Science Institute

Department of Methodology

+44 (0)20 7955 6812
Room No
Office Hours
Bookable via StudentHub
Connect with me

Key Expertise
Comparative party competition, European Parliament, Electoral systems

About me

"I’m known as a political scientist through my research and my background, but at heart I am a social scientist methodologist. My primary interests over more than two decades of research and teaching are in quantitative methods for studying the social and political world."
- Dr Ken Benoit shares his research interests as part of our 30th Anniversary celebrations. Read the full close-up with Methodology faculty.


Ken Benoit is Director of the Data Science Institute at LSE and Professor of Computational Social Science in the Department of Methodology. 

Ken’s current research focuses on computational, quantitative methods for processing large amounts of textual data, mainly political texts and social media. Current interest span from the analysis of big data, including social media, and methods of text mining.  He has published extensively on applications of measurement and the analysis of text as data in political science, including machine learning methods and text coding through crowd-sourcing, an approach that combines statistical scaling with the qualitative power of thousands of human coders working in tandem on small coding tasks.

He received his PhD in Government with a specialisation in statistical methodology from Harvard University. 

Research interests            

His substantive research interests include comparative party competition, the European Parliament, electoral systems, and transitions to democracy. Much of his recent work involves estimating the electoral effects of campaign spending. He is also a leading specialist on Hungarian elections and the Hungarian electoral system. His methodological interests include statistical methodologies for the social sciences, especially those relating to measurement and quantitative text analysis. Recent data large-scale measurement projects in which he has been involved include estimating policy positions of political parties through expert surveys, manifesto coding, and text analysis. 

See Ken's Google Scholar page.

Expertise Details

Automated quantitative methods; Political texts and social media; Analysis of big data; Methods of text mining; Comparative party competition; European Parliament; Electoral systems


  • In progress: "Quantitative Text Analysis Using R" with Paul Nulty. It covers methods for managing, processing, and analysing textual data using the R programming language and focuses on the “quanteda” package written by Ken Benoit and Paul Nulty and developed under the QUANTESS project.              
  • 2008. Giannetti, Daniela and Kenneth Benoit, eds. Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Governments. London: Routledge.              
  • 2006. Benoit, Kenneth and Michael Laver. Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.              

Scholarly Articles

  • 2011. William Lowe, Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver. “Scaling Policy Preferences From Coded Political Texts.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1, Feb): 123-155              
  • 2010. Gail McElroy and Kenneth Benoit. “Party Policy and Group Affiliation in the European Parliament.” British Journal of Political Science 40(2, April): 377-398.              
  • 2010. Kenneth Benoit and Michael Marsh. “Incumbent and Challenger Campaign Spending Effects in Proportional Electoral Systems: The Irish Elections of 2002.” Political Research Quarterly 63(1, March): 159-173.              
  • 2009. Kenneth Benoit. “Irish Political Parties and Policy Stances on European Integration.” Irish Political Studies 24(4, December): 447-466.              
  • 2009. Nina Wiesehomeier and Kenneth Benoit. “Presidents, Parties And Policy Competition.” Journal of Politics 71(4, October): 1435-1447.              
  • 2009. Kenneth Benoit and Michael Marsh. “A Relative Impact Ranking of Political Studies In Ireland.” Economic and Social Review 40(3): 269-298.              
  • 2009. Kenneth Benoit, Thomas Bräuninger, and Marc Debus. “Challenges for estimating policy preferences: Announcing an open access archive of political documents.” German Politics 18(3, September): 440-453.              
  • 2009. Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver. “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2, April): 495-513.              
  • 2008. Kenneth Benoit and Michael Marsh. “The Campaign Value of Incumbency: A New Solution to the Puzzle of Less Effective Incumbent Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4, October): 874-890.              
  • 2008. Kenneth Benoit and Michael Laver. “Compared to What? A Comment on ‘A Robust Transformation Procedure for Interpreting Political Text’ by Martin and Vanberg.” Political Analysis 16(1, Winter): 101-111.

Recent projects

  • Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data for Social Sciences              
  • World Database of Parties, Elections, and Governments              
  • Globalisation and Party Competition              
  • Domestic Structures of European Integration              
  • EUENGAGE - The goal of the EUENGAGE Project is twofold: first, to inquire into the current tensions between supranational EU governance and popular mobilisation at the national level, critically questioning EU-driven policies and EU legitimacy; and second, to propose remedial actions based on sound empirical research on the relationship between public opinion, national and supranational political elites. The medium to long-term evolutionary trend of the EU system of supranational governance has already in the past given rise to a manifestation of problems. It has become clear that the pace of integration proposed from the top, and some side-effects of integration—austerity, transnational redistribution, economic insecurity, immigration—are difficult to accept for large parts of Europe’s citizens. This misalignment is obviously a crucial issue for any system of governance that aims - as the European Union has repeatedly affirmed - to be inspired by democratic principles. The EUENGAGE project takes seriously the present state of affairs and identifies in the conflicting messages emanating from the functioning of political representation; a critical and urgent problem for the future of the EU. The EUENGAGE proposes to set up an interactive, dynamic, multilevel and replicable quasi-experimental research design. Using a variety of instruments and techniques, this design will allow us not only to study the process of representation in vivo, but also to test experimentally how innovative and efficient interactions between citizens and politicians can increase citizens’ awareness of the common problems of the Union, and the ability of the European leadership to respond         

My research