To date, Jordan and Lebanon host respectively 650,000 and 1 million Syrian refugees. Most Syrian refugees in Jordan and Lebanon have lost all sources of livelihood and face increasing vulnerability, with the majority relying on food coupons. Continuing household vulnerability has forced many refugee families in Jordan and Lebanon to accept further humiliating coping mechanisms. These include early marriage for girls as a means to secure their lives and reduce the financial burden on families, and ‘survival sex’, whereby vulnerable adult women offer sex to employers in order to secure jobs or to earn money.
Within the social and cultural contexts of Jordan and Lebanon, these severe, economically driven coping strategies challenge the understanding of resilience as a means of helping individuals to cope with disaster, without losing their gendered self-respect and self-esteem. This creates a two-fold crisis: socio-economic and moral. Literature on gender differentiated coping mechanisms undertaken by Syrian refugees provides evidence of the reconfiguration of gender, in which women act as the primary providers for their families whilst the men are mostly jobless and helpless. However, this literature mostly concentrates on the material aspects of resilience with insufficient emphasis on the relationship between the situational enactment of gender reconfiguration, the (inter)subjective aspects of experiencing gender reconfiguration and the contingent gender identity, or identities, triggered by this experience.
This research tries to fill this gap by exploring how gender reconfiguration, as a means of resilience when livelihoods are threatened, may create a crisis of gender identity whereby both men and women feel demoralised by the change in gender norms. The research also examines the link between the gender identity crisis caused by gender reconfiguration and the return to discursive tradition and religion as a means of resilience.