A Modern Magna Carta

Alf Morris and the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act
Introduction
2020 marks the 50th anniversary of the passing of a pioneering piece of social legislation called the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act (CSDPA). Following its passing in 1970 it was hailed as a magna carta for people with disabilities, a key milestone in the development of rights and provision of services for people with various health conditions and a model for such legislation worldwide.
This exhibition tells the story of the passing of the Act largely through extracts from the papers of Alf Morris MP, who plotted its journey through Parliamentary processes and onto the statute book. Morris became the World's first Minister for the Disabled in 1974 and continued to fight for disability rights throughout his career, including the Disability Discrimination Actwhich also celebrates its 25th anniversary in 2020. He was made Lord Morris of Manchester in 1997 and LSE Library is the custodian of his papers.
Content Warning
Please be aware that this exhibition features material which was created many years ago. Some of this material contains language and terminology which is outdated and which visitors may find upsetting.
The Luck of the Draw


These are two extracts from letters sent to Alf in November 1969 after Alf's name was drawn in first place in the annual Private Member's Bill ballot.
This stroke of luck gives the 20 MPs who are drawn the chance to propose and draft a piece of legislation. If the Bill gets through the debates and amendments in the House of Commons and then the Lords it finally becomes law. Watch the draw for the 2019/20 session.
In November 1969 Alf Morris won a coveted first place in the ballot. Good news travelled fast and he received numerous requests from individuals and organisations to draft legislation that would support their causes. Suggestions came from the Consumer Council, the League Against Blood Sports; the Registered Plumbers Association and the National Civil Liberties Council. He was also asked to support a bill for Voluntary Euthanasia.
Alf chose instead to focus attention on people with disabilities.
The Act
The CSDPA was a significant advance in the provision of social services for the long-term sick and disabled.
The final CSDPA Act included clauses which:
- Made it a duty for local authorities to actively collect information about how many people were covered by the Act within their jurisdictions and to inform them of the services they could get access to.
- Made services available including at-home assistance; help with transportation to use services; access to recreational equipment and facilities; at-home meals and the provision of telephones to aide with communication.
- Made authorities responsible for ensuring suitable housing was provided and public buildings were made accessible, including the provision of toilets.
Allies and Assistance
Alf had support from a number of people in the drafting of the legislation and some of these have been kept as part of his papers.
These include a letter from fellow Labour MP Jack Ashley asking Alf to take account of a number of proposed clauses for his Bill, including the suggestion for a Disability Rights Board to be established - something which arguably only happened when the Disability Rights Commission was launched in 1999:
Jack was keenly receptive to the Act and worked closely with Alf on its creation. His name also appears as part of this Joint Ad Hoc Committee which met with the Central Council of the Disabled to discuss Alf’s Bill in January 1970:

Ashley was himself prominent as the first fully deaf MP and worked throughout his career with campaigners and organisations to progress disability rights.
You can also see a fuller list of organisations which contributed to the Act here:

Contemporaries
There had been recent legislation proposed to support people with disabilities. In 1968 Conservative MP Jim Prior had drafted a Private Members Bill called the Disabled Persons' Pensions and Miscellaneous Provisions Bill. The Bill made a number of recommendations such as the provision of a disability pension and proposals to make public buildings provide better access to people with disabilities. However, it didn’t get enough votes to get past a second reading in the Commons and was shelved.
This is a page showing some of the provisions considered for the Bill:

A few months after the CSDPA was passed, The Education (Handicapped Children) Actalso made it onto the statute book. Prior to the Act passing, children with learning difficulties were considered to be ‘ineducable’ and not entitled to education within the school system. The Act overturned this and, for the first time, gave Local Education Authorities responsibility for all children’s education.

Causes and Campaigners
Often legislative change comes after causes and campaigns have drawn attention to an injustice. The CSDPA was no different.
One of the key groups from the 1960s calling for change was the Disablement Income Group (DIG). They were founded in 1965 by two pioneering disabled women: Megan Du Boison and Berit Moore who were angered at the lack of financial support available to people with disabilities. DIG was a ‘pan-impairment’ campaign i.e. they looked at issues affecting all people with disabilities and regardless of the specific health conditions or impairments that people had.
Here is an extract from an early leaflet produced by DIG and sent to Labour politician (and contemporary of Alf’s) Peter Shore, which shows some of their early thinking:

There’s also material from a smaller and less well-known organisation called the National Campaign for the Young Chronic Sick (NCYCS).
This is an extract from a letter sent to Alf from Marsh Dickson who was the President of the NCYCS.

This is the front cover of the 3rd newsletter produced by the NCYCS.

The NCYCS was founded to raise awareness and combat the practice of sending younger people with disabilities and chronic illnesses to live in geriatric wards. The campaign worked as Alf (and others) raised the issue during debates in Parliament and Section 17 of the CSDPA made provisions to prevent younger patients being given accommodation within such wards.
An Income for All
One of the DIG’s key proposals was the introduction of a National Disability Income, provided as a form of social security and paid to all people with disabilities based on need.
DIG were keen to work with and lobby politicians to enact legislative change. They also incorporated help from academics and experts who understood the social security system. One key figure was Peter Townsend.
This extract is from an early working paper produced by DIG which used research done by Peter. It’s called Survey of the Welfare Problems of Correspondents of DIG:

Townsend was an academic who had come to prominence in the 1960s for his work investigating the poverty which was still impacting communities across the UK despite the formation of the welfare state. Townsend co-founded the Child Poverty Action Group (whose papers are also held at LSE Library) and later went on to help found the Disability Alliance. He was also closely connected to DIG and here is an extract from a memorandum he sent to Morris in 1973 continuing to argue for an income for people with disabilities ‘by right’.

Defend the 1970 Act!
The CSDPA was passed at the end of a decade which had been overseen largely by Harold Wilson’s Labour government. Indeed it was one of the last pieces of Labour legislation to get Royal Assent, squeezing its way into law on the 29 May 1970. Three weeks later there was a new Conservative administration in power.
Many of the Act’s provisions became the devolved responsibility of local authorities and there were considerable differences between how much authorities provided or were able to provide.
An article from 1971 in The Times called Disparities in the new deal for the disabled reported:
there appear to be great disparities in local responses to the obligations imposed by the Act.
Here’s an extract from a draft of a speech about Manchester’s Social Services Department, with a more positive appraisal of its effectiveness in implementing the reforms:

The twin elections in February and October 1974 saw the Labour Party narrowly returning to power with a slim parliamentary majority.
The mid to late 1970s saw a series of economic crises which plagued the government until the end of the decade and into the next. Alongside the economic uncertainty there were growing threats to public services and expenditure as the decade wore on and the government changed. This included many services and programmes designed for people with disabilities.
Here’s part of a 1975 letter sent from Action Research for the Crippled Child to Alf about the potential for increasing cuts to expenditure:

This is an extract from a newspaper headline about anti-cuts demonstrations by people with disabilities:

This flyer is from a conference organised by OUTSET: Action on Disability in 1980 and warns about the threats to the CSDPA.

Minister for the Disabled
Alf held his Parliamentary seat from 1964 to 1997 and even when Labour was out of power his Wythenshawe majority remained solid. In 1974 he was returned, again, to serve as MP but in a matter of months, and as a result of his years of work on behalf of people with disabilities, he was promoted to become the world’s first Minister for the Disabled.
Here’s an extract from an article in Community Care magazine about Alf’s new role:

Despite the economic difficulties which beset the decade, campaigns and organisations continued to press the Government to provide support schemes and social security.
This is an extract from a newsletter from the Central Council of the Disabled, congratulating Alf on his promotion whilst also reminding him of the importance of building upon the work already done:

And here is a letter from the Disablement Income Group pressing Alf to continue to work for a National Disability Income:

The early to mid 1970s saw a number of new benefits being introduced. The following two newspaper extracts highlighted two of these benefits, namely the 1975 Mobility Allowance and the Non Contributory Invalidity Pension.


There was a degree of controversy over both however.
Feminist Fightback
The non-contributory pension was one of the measures in the 1975 Social Security Act. It had been seen as a way of providing benefits to people with disabilities who had not worked, or were unable to work, and therefore could not contribute towards national insurance schemes.
Originally the payments were intended to cover men and single women but this was overturned while the Bill was still being debated and married women with disabilities were also included.
However, the Act stipulated that married women had to pass an additional ‘housewife’ test before they would receive any payment. This led to claims by feminists that married women with disabilities were treated like second class citizens.
Here are a couple of pieces of protest literature about the scheme:


Eventually the 1984 Severe Disablement Allowance replaced the pension and provided benefits to men and women equally.
Getting Around
The Mobility Allowance was put in place to provide all people with disabilities with a cash payment to help them to pay for transportation in order to get around.
One of the results of the new scheme was that it replaced so-called ‘invalid trikes’ or Invacars (after the company that first produced them). These were specially designed vehicles which had been in production since the end of the Second World War. The cars were available, free of charge, via the NHS to people with certain disabilities to use as a form of transport.
Read a detailed and fascinating history of these three-wheeled cars.
By the mid 1970s, however, there were safety concerns about their use and the fact that people with different kinds of disability were essentially excluded from owning one meant that the Mobility Allowance was proposed as an alternative scheme.
Labour politician David Ennals, who was Secretary of State for Social Services, announced the ending of the scheme.
View a video of Ennals being protested for the decision on the BFI website.
And footage of the cars in action on the same site.
Here’s a letter he wrote to people affected (and annoyed) by the changes:

A Social Responsibility
This exhibition shows some of the changes which were brought about by governments, politicians and campaigners that impacted the lives of people with disabilities. As an MP and later Minister in government, Alf had much contact with groups leading such change. A considerable portion of an MP’s work is also, however, representing their constituency and providing assistance to members of the public.
The final item in this exhibition is a letter which was sent to Alf just after the CSDPA had passed. For data protection reasons it has been partly redacted:



The letter is perhaps worth highlighting because it shows the positive difference that was made by the CSDPA and legislation like it, but it also highlights how a lack of proper representation by people with disabilities could lead to poor outcomes.
The social model of disability maintains that some of the most difficult barriers for people to overcome are caused by society. Disability should not therefore be understood as a medical issue which prevents individuals from joining society but rather how society prevents all people taking part within it. Changes advocated by Morris and other disability activists and allies continue to make the world more accessible for everyone.
Exhibition audio guide
We have created an audio guide for this exhibition where Indy takes us through the story and highlights some of the objects selected.
Further information
Catch up on the exhibition events
Manchester Digifest
The Manchester Histories DigiFest 2020 in September marked and celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Chronically Sick and Disabled Persons Act 1970, pioneered by the late Lord Alf Morris and 50 years of Disabled Peoples’ Rights.
Three short films about Alf’s life, created in collaboration with Brazen Productions, were also shown at the Digifest. You can watch the series of films on YouTube:
An interview with Tanni Grey-Thompson
Watch a short interview of Tanni Grey-Thompson conducted by Indy Bhullar as part of this exhibition.

Explore our collections
Learn more about our collections by exploring our curated collection highlights.
Contact us
For further information, contact the team marking your email for the attention of Indy Bhullar.