Skip to main content

Climate Emergency and the Future of Civic Space

The impetus for securitizing climate change is often about prioritizing the issue and galvanizing transformative action for mitigation and adaptation. The reality of securitizing an issue, however, is that it tends to promote militarized and authoritarian responses to address real or perceived existential threats.

This project of research and engagement seeks to foster understanding of the risks of securitizing the climate crisis for the future of civic space and human rights and to identify ways to prevent and mitigate these risks through disruption and innovation.

Drawing on lessons from the war on terror, the first phase of the project modelled three pathways to securitizing the climate crisis - prioritization, militarization, and authoritarianisation – and identified some of the risks they create for human rights and civic space. Our findings and recommendations are elaborated in the report Climate Emergency and the Future of Civic Space: Lessons from the War on Terror.

The current phase of the project draws on the concept of civic ecosystemsto map, analyze, and begin to catalyze the ecosystem of actors, ideas and practices that can address the risks of militarized and authoritarian responses to the climate crisis. It investigates six components of the climate securitization ecosystem:

The aim is to develop an analytical tool and practical resource for activists, funders, epistemic and policy communities that can assist in identifying openings and junctures where disruption of the pathways to securitizing climate change may be possible and innovation may open up alternative pathways.

The project is funded by the Funders Initiative for Civil Society at Global Dialogue and carried out in collaboration with Civic Futures.