1.) What do you enjoy most about your programme and studying Philosophy at LSE?
Philosophy at LSE is taught with the same rigour one can expect from 'traditional STEM subjects'. Clear argumentation, logical structure, and precision matter. There’s no tolerance for hand-wavy thinking, especially when dealing with abstract problems. Studying joint-honours in economics, the crossovers between the two have been particularly rewarding. I can think about utility theory or decision-making not just mathematically, but normatively and epistemically. Philosophy forces you to interrogate the assumptions economics often takes for granted. LSE’s interdisciplinary environment makes that kind of integration natural. This is aided by the freedom LSE affords us in choosing modules outside our degree programme. It’s a great environment for students who want to go beyond disciplinary boundaries and actually understand the foundations of the models we use. All of this contributes to the sense that you’re doing real philosophy. You’re not just reading dead men, but grappling with problems that matter now. This has been what I’ve enjoyed most.
2.) What stands out to you most about the Philosophy Department?
What sets LSE’s Philosophy Department apart is its clarity of purpose. It doesn’t try to be everything to everyone. If you're looking for an in-depth study into Aristotle or traditions shaped by continental philosophers like Husserl, Kierkegaard, Adorno, or Foucault, you may not find the same focus here as you would in some other departments. This is what makes it distinctive. Many departments lean toward more interpretive or literary styles of philosophy. LSE has carved out a space for something different: a philosophy that is clear, structured, and engaged with the tools of formal reasoning, probability, and science. It’s philosophy that wants to intervene in, not just commentate on public policy, AI ethics, or political theory. This gives the department a kind of intellectual discipline and urgency you don’t often find.
3.) How has studying Philosophy at LSE shaped the way you think or approach the world?
Studying Philosophy at LSE has developed not just how I think, but how I engage with others. One of the most valuable lessons I’ve learned is how to relate to disagreement. Disagreement is not something to avoid, nor a direct personal attack, but an opportunity for progress. This mindset has been directly shaped by the way our professors and class teachers interact with us. The calibre of the people in the department is extraordinary, you’re learning from leading thinkers in animal ethics, political philosophy, and the philosophy of science. But what’s even more striking is how approachable and intellectually generous they are. They don’t shut down challenges; they welcome them. This is not done performatively, but with genuine interest. Their behaviour sets the foundation for a culture of real discussion. It makes speaking up in seminars feel natural, and that atmosphere has been instrumental in building my academic confidence and a genuine sense of freedom in my thinking. I feel that this culture has made me a better listener, a more careful critic, and a more collaborative thinker, skills that extend far beyond the classroom.
4.) Why would you recommend studying at LSE Philosophy?
Having mentioned our unique interdisciplinary studies, contemporary/relevant curriculum, and dedicated staff - LSE Philosophy’s student body has been equally inspiring. Our environment is shaped not only by academic excellence, but by the range and intensity of student ambition. One of the most striking aspects of studying here has been meeting people who are genuinely just passionate about any topic, often in unexpected ways. My peers include aspiring screenwriters, clergypersons, chefs, and musicians, among more ‘expected’ LSE paths such as consultancy or finance. The sheer breadth of people you meet serves as a reminder of the many meaningful directions any one of your interests can lead, when pursued with genuine commitment. Many bring a sense of clarity and purpose to what they’re doing, it is rare to find a university environment where this kind of seriousness of intent is the norm. Importantly, LSE is not an atmosphere of toxic competitiveness, but an intellectually dynamic environment where conversations are rarely narrow and never complacent. This culture of ambition and curiosity means students take ideas seriously, not just for academic credit, but because they see them as ways to achieve something meaningful. This kind of atmosphere sharpens your thinking, broadens your perspective, and makes the study of philosophy feel continuous with the world outside it. You’re not just learning philosophy, you’re doing it.
5.) What advice would you give to someone considering studying Philosophy at LSE?
Philosophy at LSE rewards curiosity over preconception. Recognise that some of the best thinking happens in discussion rather than in isolation, LSE’s seminars have been built around that tenet. Speak to people, especially those who think differently from you. I’ve found most of my valuable insights have emerged from respectful disagreement. Equally, you should take full advantage of the high-calibre faculty we have. Through bookable office-hours, post lecture discussions, or otherwise; it is remarkably easy to approach them, share your ideas, and hear theirs. The opportunity to engage seriously with leading thinkers is rare, and incredibly rewarding. Finally, make the most of the opportunities to study across disciplines. The most interesting philosophical questions often extend beyond the boundaries of any single field, and LSE provides the space to explore them.
