Study Home Page

Teachers before the 'Threshold'

 

LSE study of the Green Paper pay system for teachers and its effects



Teachers before the 'Threshold'

3. Teachers' views on linking pay to performance

Teachers stand apart from most other groups of public servants, but alongside doctors and nurses, in their opposition to performance pay in principle. Of the two thirds who disagreed with the principle, over half did so strongly. This opposition was already evident in the CEP's earlier study which included head teachers6, and is visible too in the more recent opinion surveys carried out for the teachers' unions7. Opposition is also strong to one of the key proposals: that performance management should take some account of pupil progress. Teachers are strongly attached to the principle that pay should reflect job demands, there is a strong feeling that all teachers deserve a pay rise, and that whatever the unfairness and inconsistencies of the old system, the proposed link between pay and performance will do little to improve fairness.

No.   Disagree Neutral Agree
2 The principle of relating teachers' pay to performance is a good one 63 12 24
4 The principle that individual teachers' pay should take some account of pupil progress is a good one 56 17 27
3 Teachers' pay should reflect the demands of the post and not the performance of individuals 11 11 77
16 The salary levels above the Threshold are too low to make me want to work harder in order to get them 14 39 36
6 The best way to reward good teaching is to raise existing salary levels for all teachers 12 9 79
21 Linking pay with the Performance Review will result in a fairer allocation of pay 70 15 11

Note: in this, and similar tables in this article, the figures show row percentages, omitting 'don't knows'. Thus 63% disagreed with the principle of performance pay (Q2), 12% were 'neutral', and 24% 'agreed', and 1% (not shown) did not know.

The Green Paper stresses the positive arguments for improving rewards and incentives, but much of the teachers' response is likely to be conditioned by what they believe are its true objectives. Here, there is general scepticism about the professed goal of raising pupil achievements, and a strong suspicion that there is a hidden agenda of minimising the cost of uprating teachers' salaries, and of getting more work out of them. This is clear from the belief that financial constraints will impose a 'quota' so that many deserving teachers will not be allowed to pass the Threshold. Signs of teachers feeling the 'under siege' can be seen in the large number who believe they cannot work any harder than they do, and that they usually lose out whenever things change in education.

No.   Disagree Neutral Agree
8 The Green Paper pay system is designed to raise pupil achievements 58 22 13
9 The Green Paper pay system is a device to avoid paying more money to all teachers 9 18 68
10 For all that is said about pupil attainments, the Green Paper pay system is simply a device to get more work done. 14 26 54
20 In practice, many excellent teachers will not pass the Threshold because there is certain to be a quota on places available 3 8 82
14 Whenever changes are made in education teachers usually lose out in the end 10 22 66
13 It is very hard for teachers like me to improve our performance because we already work as hard as we possibly can 6 6 88

 

6. Marsden D.W, and French S. (1998) What a performance: performance related pay in the public services. Centre for Economic Performance Special Report, London School of Economics.

7. 'Teachers' attitudes to the Green Paper', NOP Survey for the NASUWT, January 1999. 'Teachers' Threshold Survey. Tabulations and report prepared by NOP Research Group for the NASUWT', September 1999/430817.

Previous | Next


Home | Help | Search | Index

Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2000