|
Risk is intrinsic to most facets of everyday life. Whilst economic
changes and technological innovations have provided many
positive benefits to modern existence, the effects are
nonetheless double-edged. Individuals are faced with ambient
risks and must take steps in order to ensure self-protection and
self-insurance (e.g. becoming more “techno-savvy” and “media
literate”). However, members of the public are not alone in
protecting themselves and their families from potential risks:
for example, recognising that young people may be exposed to
inappropriate material, Ofcom is working with key stakeholders
to promote media literacy skills across society. Similarly, the
FSA is promoting public understanding of the financial system.
Consumer education is thus seen as a key part of consumer
protection, the aim being to help consumers make informed
choices in a complex and risky environment.
Reaching out to the consumer
How do new styles of regulation conceptualise the needs of the
public? How are consumers represented within the new culture of
regulation? In an ever-changing social climate in which risks
are invisible yet omnipresent, the FSA and Ofcom are fostering
new ways of protecting consumers. Their responsibilities now go
beyond traditional forms of regulation, so as to give
individuals the knowledge and skills necessary to become
informed consumers, and to promote public education and
awareness so as to encourage individuals to make informed
choices. They hold consultations and engage with user groups and
stakeholders, and embrace research on issues such as social
values and cultural diversity. In an unprecedented manner, the
new culture of regulation is thus striving to promote and
facilitate civic engagement, participation and forums for public
debate, and educate and further the interests of the public. Yet
little is known about how the regulators balance stakeholder
interests and standpoints against the needs of the public or
about the crucial interactions among regulators, key
stakeholders and the public.
How does the public understand the changing context of risk and
regulation?
Members of the public face a plethora of decisions and choices,
together with an expanding context of information, advice,
guidelines, codes of practice and opportunities to engage (ask,
complain, feedback, consult, etc). How do they characterise the
kinds of risks facing them? What knowledge do they have about
the regulatory frameworks and its challenges? How do they
understand the broader context, in terms of relations among
regulation, government, commerce and the public? Are they using
the new types of information available to them? Do they believe
themselves to be more able to make more informed choices and
decisions in their day-to-day lives as a result? While many are
charting the successes and difficulties of the regulators, less
attention has been paid to the public’s understanding of its
changing role and responsibilities, with many unanswered
questions regarding people’s understanding, concerns,
perceptions of risk and strategies of risk management in their
daily lives. |
|
|