BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//hacksw/handcal//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:19710101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20160603T000000
UID:https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/?post_type=event&#038;p=18832
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/London:20260410T230943Z
LOCATION:London School of Economics\, Tower 2\, Room 9.04\, Clement's Inn\, London\, WC2A 2AZ
DESCRIPTION:<h3>Grantham seminar introduced and chaired by Antony Millner\, Associate Professorial Research Fellow at the Grantham Research Institute</h3>
Prof. Matthew Adler\, Richard A. Horvitz Professor of Law and Professor of Economics\, Philosophy and Public Policy at Duke Law\, will be the speaker for this event. Matthew will present his upcoming paper entitled “<a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/AdlerTreich.PrioritarianismAndClimateChange.2015.pdf">Prioritarianism and Climate Change</a>”.

The abstract from the paper is below:

"Prioritarianism is the ethical view that gives greater weight to well-being changes affecting individuals at lower well-being levels. This view is influential both in moral philosophy\, and in theoretical work on social choice—where it is captured by a social welfare function (“SWF”) summing a concave transformation of individual well-being numbers. However\, prioritarianism has largely been ignored by scholarship on climate change. This Article compares utilitarianism and prioritarianism as frameworks for evaluating climate policy. It reviews the distinctive normative choices that are required for the prioritarian approach: specifying a ratio scale for well-being (if the prioritarian SWF takes the standard “Atkinson” form)\; determining the degree of concavity of the transformation function (i.e.\, the degree of social inequality aversion)\; and choosing between “ex ante” and “ex post” prioritarianism under conditions of risk. The Article also sketches some of salient implications of a prioritarian SWF for climate policy—with respect to the social cost of carbon\, the social discount rate\, optimal mitigation\, and the “dismal theorem.” Finally\, it discusses the issue of variable population."
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/grantham-seminar-matthew-adler-prioritarianism-and-climate-change/
SUMMARY:Grantham seminar | Matthew Adler ‘Prioritarianism and climate change’
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20160603T000000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR