BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//hacksw/handcal//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:19710101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20220302T140000
UID:https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/?post_type=event&#038;p=56343
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/London:20260422T183524Z
LOCATION:Online (via Zoom)
DESCRIPTION:<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Christopher Timmins is a Professor in the Department of Economics at Duke University\, with a secondary appointment in Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment. </p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>He will be presenting his paper ‘Does Racial Bias Distort Neighborhood Choice? The Impacts of Discrimination on Welfare and Revealed Preference in the Rental Housing Market’</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>By constraining an individual's choice during a search\, housing discrimination distorts sorting decisions away from true preferences and results in a ceteris paribus reduction in buyer welfare.  This study combines a large-scale field experiment with a residential sorting model to derive utility-theoretic measures of renter welfare loss associated with the constraints imposed by discrimination in the rental housing market.  In the five major metropolitan markets we study\, we find that key amenities such as lower air toxicity and better schools are associated with higher levels of discrimination.  We estimate welfare costs to renters from discriminatory constraints during the first phase of a search in these cities to be equivalent to 4.6% and 4.7% of the annual incomes for the average African American and Hispanic/LatinX households\, respectively.  For African American renters\, these costs increase substantially at higher levels of income due to systematic exclusion from high amenity neighborhoods.  African American renters face damages greater than 7% of income at income levels above $100\,000 per year.  We then study the effects of discrimination on revealed preferences for urban amenities.  We find that discrimination drives a wedge between true preferences for key neighborhood amenities and those estimated without accounting for discriminatory constraints.  A naive model that ignores those constraints understates the marginal willingness to pay of renters of color for a variety of neighborhood amenities by 2.2% to 5.2% relative to White renters.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Please email <a href="mailto:gri.events@lse.ac.uk"><strong>gri.events@lse.ac.uk</strong></a>  to request the Zoom joining details for this workshop by by 5pm on Tuesday\, 1st March 2022.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/does-racial-bias-distort-neighborhood-choice-the-impacts-of-discrimination-on-welfare-and-revealed-preference-in-the-rental-housing-market-christopher-timmins/
SUMMARY:Does Racial Bias Distort Neighborhood Choice? The Impacts of Discrimination on Welfare and Revealed Preference in the Rental Housing Market | Christopher Timmins
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20220302T123000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR