BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//hacksw/handcal//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:19710101T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:19710101T010000
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20231116T133000
UID:https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/?post_type=event&#038;p=67629
DTSTAMP;TZID=Europe/London:20260405T200924Z
LOCATION:FAW 9.04\, London School of Economics\, Clement’s Inn\, London WC2A 2AZ
DESCRIPTION:<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Charlie Palmer will discussing the paper <em>Forest co-management and poverty-environment traps</em>.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p>Implemented globally since the 1990s\, co-management involves the devolution and transfer of common-pool resource rights from governments to rural communities. In practice\, this process often also involves efforts to improve households’ returns to labour with respect to resource extraction. Quantitative empirical evidence to date suggests mixed effects with respect to forest co-management’s impacts on poverty and resource conservation\, including in Sub-Saharan Africa. Our study seeks to contribute to the literature with a better understanding of the behavioural channels through which co-management influences poverty and forests and the mechanisms by which co-management changes behaviour underlying outcomes. With a focus on Malawi\, we construct a household panel dataset and empirically evaluate the poverty and forest impacts of the national-level Improved Forest Management for Sustainable Livelihoods Programme (IFMSLP) two and five years after it ended in 2014. The results from application of a differences-in-differences framework to our data suggest that the IFMSLP increased rather than reduced household poverty. As measured by incomes\, assets and a measure of food security\, the Food Consumption Score\, the estimated increase in poverty is larger in 2016 than in 2019. The IFMSLP had no overall effect on deforestation. To understand why and how co-management increased poverty\, we test the hypothesis that co-management's focus on low-productivity resource extraction and use\, coupled with fewer alternative livelihood options\, is associated with worsening poverty. The increase in poverty is found among households with fewer livelihood options and a dependence on subsistence agriculture and fuelwood collection prior to co-management.</p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->

<!-- wp:paragraph -->
<p><strong>Grantham Workshops are only open to LSE researchers and alumni. If you wish to attend the workshop in person or online please sign up to our <a href="https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/grantham-workshop-registration-of-interest/">workshop mailing list.</a></strong></p>
<!-- /wp:paragraph -->
URL;VALUE=URI:https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/charlie-palmer-grantham-workshop-2/
SUMMARY:Forest co-management and poverty-environment traps | Charlie Palmer
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20231116T120000
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR