Home > Website archive > News and media > News archives > 2015 > 04 > Are we really 'all in this together'?

Are we really 'all in this together'?

Inequality of pre- and post-tax income has risen remarkably in the UK since the late 1970s. And while inequality of net income fell in the aftermath of the financial crisis, there are signs that it is rising once again.

What’s more, the tax and benefit changes since 2010 have been largely regressive, with people in the bottom half of the income distribution losing more than they have gained. The main cleavage is between pensioners who have done well compared with those of working age, especially the young and households with children.

Telectionseries_logo_05-(2)hese are among the conclusions of a new report from LSE's Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) – the latest in a series of background briefings on key policy issues in the May 2015 UK general election. The CEP reports that:

  • The UK’s richest one per cent have between 12.5 per cent and 15.5 per cent of all income. This is mid-way between the United States (with a top one per cent share of 20 per cent) and continental Europe (where in France and Spain, it is 8 per cent).
  • The income share of the UK’s top one per cent has been rising steadily since the late 1970s, mainly due to labour income (wages) but also with a role for capital income (dividends, capital gains, housing rents, etc.).
  • Wage inequality has steadily escalated for the top half of the earnings distribution. In 1978, the top 10 per cent earned 1.6 times those in the middle. By 2013, this had risen to a factor of three to one.
  • For the bottom half of wage earners, inequality expanded rapidly in the 1980s before stabilising for men from the mid-1990s and actually falling for women.
  • Changing wage inequality is partly due to increased demand for skilled workers because of new technologies. But institutions such as unions and minimum wages also matter.
  • In the 2008-09 crisis, inequality fell but it has been stable since then. Average wages and incomes have fallen for just about every group since the crisis. It is too soon to tell whether inequality will resume its rising trend as the economy fully recovers.
  • Net income (after tax and benefits) is more equally distributed than pre-tax and benefit income. The richest fifth have 15 times the pre-tax income of the poorest fifth, but only four times as much after taxes and benefits. Nevertheless, the increase in post-tax income inequality has followed the same trends as that of pre-tax inequality.
  • Modelling changes to direct taxes, tax credits and benefits since the coalition government came to power shows that overall policies have been mainly regressive. The bottom half of the income distribution lost more from cuts to tax credit and benefits than they gained from higher income tax allowances. Pensioners have done especially well compared with the young.
  • The top one per cent enjoy about 40 per cent of capital income flows. There is much uncertainty on the stock of wealth inequality. Wealth will be increasingly important for inequality as it is rising faster than aggregate income, and the concentration of capital income is much greater than the concentration of labour income.

Gabriel Zucman, author of the report, concludes: "To combat wage inequality, increasing skills, especially for the disadvantaged, is vital.

"In terms of capital inequality, Labour’s proposals to abolish non-domiciled residents’ tax status will reduce inequality, whereas the Conservatives’ policy of boosting inheritance tax allowances will increase inequality."

Posted: 17 April 2015

Notes for Editors:

‘Inequality: Are we really ‘all in this together?’  by Gabriel Zucman

For further information, contact:

Romesh Vaitilingam, T: 07768 661095, E: romesh@vaitilingam.com
Jo Cantlay, T: 020 7955 7285, E: j.m.cantlay@lse.ac.uk.

 

Share:Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn|