1.

Responsibilities of Sub-Boards of Examiners

1.1

Each degree programme shall be the responsibility of a Sub-Board of Examiners. Taking into account all information properly presented to it and by exercising its academic judgement, the Sub-Board shall decide if each candidate has satisfactorily completed all elements of assessment as set out in the programme regulations. Where the Sub-Board recommends that an award should be made, it will also determine the classification of the award in accordance with section 7 below.

1.2

Each course shall be the responsibility of a Sub-Board of Examiners. The Sub-Board shall confirm a numerical mark for each candidate taking a course falling within its responsibility.

2.

 External Examiners

2.1

Each Sub-Board of Examiners shall include at least one external examiner competent to judge the candidates concerned.

2.2

All elements of assessment for a course shall be marked by internal examiners and, as appropriate, an external examiner.

2.3

No mark or grade shall be assigned for any course or element of assessment for a course without an external examiner having been able to approve it, whether or not s/he attended a meeting of examiners.

3.

Award of Marks

3.1

The examiners for each course will decide a numerical mark for each candidate using the following scale:

First Class Honours
Upper Second Class Honours
Lower Second Class Honours
Third Class Honours
Fail

70 - 100
60 - 69
50 - 59
40 - 49
0 - 39

3.2

Unless they receive written instructions from the Examinations Office to do so, e.g. in the case of dyslexic candidates, examiners shall assess work without referring to medical and/or extenuating circumstances. Such circumstances will be considered by the Sub-Board of Examiners at the meeting where the award of degrees is considered.

4.

Eligibility for Award of Degree

4.1

In order to be considered for a degree, a candidate must have completed all elements of assessment for each course as listed in the corresponding programme regulations. A second-year direct entry candidate must have completed all elements of assessment for each course listed in the second and third years of the corresponding programme regulations.

4.2

A candidate who is absent for any element of assessment for a course will be considered not to have completed the course. Moreover, the absence will count as one of the attempts allowed for the course unless it is authorised by the Chair of the Sub-Board of Examiners responsible for the programme.

4.3

A candidate will be eligible for the award of a degree if s/he has no more than three unredeemed fails in papers¹ listed in the corresponding programme regulations. A second-year direct entry candidate will be eligible for the award of a degree if s/he has no more than one unredeemed fail in papers listed in the second and third years of the corresponding programme regulations. The award of a degree with honours is subject to the penalty rules as set out in section 7.2 below.

4.4

All LSE undergraduate students are enrolled on course LSE100. However, LSE100 is not counted for the purposes of classification.

5.

Classification Marks and the Aggregate

5.1

The classification of each candidate shall be based on nine 'classification marks', comprising:

5.1.1

 the marks achieved in all eight second and third year papers¹;

5.1.2

 a ninth mark being the average² of the best three marks in first year papers. For second-year direct entry candidates, the ninth mark will be the average² of all eight second and third year papers.

5.2

The aggregate for each candidate is the sum of the nine 'classification marks'. In all cases, the 'classification marks' shall be based on the marks obtained by the candidate in her/his latest attempt at each element of assessment for each course.

6.

Treatment of Half Units
This Classification Scheme, including its penalty rules, is based on the marks achieved by candidates in all papers¹ taken in fulfilment of the programme regulations. For the purposes of determining 'classification marks' and, if necessary, applying the penalty rules, the marks obtained for half-unit courses shall be paired and averaged² using the following criteria in the order set out below:

6.1

according to the appropriate degree regulations;

6.2

according to the stage of the degree: half-units taken in the same year of study as set out in the programme regulations shall be paired;

6.3

according to the department in which the half-units are taken:

• half-units with the same departmental prefix (e.g. MA) shall be paired;
• all remaining single half-units from different departments shall be paired.

6.4

according to the marks awarded for each half-unit:

• the two half-units with the highest marks, then those with the next highest marks, and so on, shall be paired.

7.

Degree Classification, including Penalty Rules

7.1

Subject to the application of the penalty rules for failed papers in section 7.2 below, the classification of an award shall be calculated as follows:

7.1.1

For first class honours: Five first class marks; or four first class marks and an aggregate of at least 590

7.1.2

For upper second class honours: Five upper second class marks (or above); or four upper second class marks (or above) and an aggregate of at least 515

7.1.3

For lower second class honours: Five lower second class marks (or above); or four lower second class marks (or above) and an aggregate of at least 440

7.1.4

For third class honours: Eight third class marks (or above)

7.1.5

For a pass degree: A pass degree will only be awarded as a result of the application of the penalty rules set out in section 7.2 below

7.2

The classification of an award for a candidate with an unredeemed fail in any paper¹ taken in fulfilment of the programme regulations shall be calculated as follows (n.b. paragraphs 7.2.1(b) and 7.2.2 do not apply for a second-year direct entry candidate):

7.2.1

A drop of one class in the award classification shall result where a candidate has:
(a) made no serious attempt³ at an element of the assessment for a course, and/or
(b) unredeemed fails in two papers.

7.2.2

The degree shall be capped at 'pass' where a candidate has unredeemed fails in three papers.

8.

Appeals and Offences
Appeals against decisions of Sub-Board of Examiners will be handled according to Regulations for the consideration of appeals against decisions of boards of examiners for taught courses. Assessment offences will be handled according to Regulations on assessment offences: plagiarism or Regulations on assessment offences: offences other than plagiarism. All School Regulations are published in the School Calendar.

9.

General Proviso
It is also open to a Sub-Board of Examiners to recommend to the School Board of Examiners for BA/BSc Degrees any departure from this Scheme if, in their judgement, this would be equitable for any individual candidate or group of candidates as a direct result of medical and/or extenuating circumstances. Such circumstances would need to be extraneous to the normal assessment process and would apply to that candidate or group of candidates only.

¹

Notes
 Under the programme regulations for all of the School's BA/BSc degrees, candidates have to complete four 'papers' in each of their three years of study. Second year direct entry candidates have to complete four 'papers' in each of their second and third years of study. Each 'paper' represents a full-unit course or two half-unit courses.

²

Where marks are averaged, the resulting average will be rounded to the nearest whole mark.

³

Decisions on what counts as a serious attempt will vary from discipline to discipline. The Sub-Board of Examiners responsible for the candidate's degree programme will take these decisions in consultation with the relevant internal and external examiners. The School Board of Examiners for BA/BSc Degrees must ratify all such decisions.