Popper Seminar

Loading Events
Find Events

Event Views Navigation

Upcoming Events › Popper Seminar

Events List Navigation

February 2017

Campbell Brown (LSE): “Priority and Uncertainty”

21 February, 2:00 pm3:30 pm
LAK 2.06, Lakatos Building
London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom
+ Google Map

Prioritarianism is often considered a preferable alternative to egalitarianism. However, seeing exactly what distinguishes these two views can be difficult. Prioritarianism says it is better to benefit the worse off (other things being equal). Egalitarianism says it is better to reduce inequality (other things being equal). But by benefiting the worse off we narrow the gap between them and the better off, thereby reducing inequality. The two views thus seem to go hand in hand. So what's the difference? Parfit illustrates this with an analogy. People at lower altitudes can breath more easily than those at higher altitudes, but the ease with which a person breathes depends only on her own altitude, not that of anyone else. Similarly, on prioritarianism, benefiting people at lower levels of well-being matters more than benefiting those at higher levels, but the extent to which benefiting a person matters depends only on her own well-being level, not that of anyone else. Egalitarianism disagrees: benefiting a person at a given level matters more when others are at a higher level; that is, when doing so has the effect of reducing inequality. One aim of this paper is to spell out the analogy more precisely. I argue that one natural way of doing this commits the prioritarian to a view about the betterness of uncertain prospects or lotteries, a view sometimes called 'ex post prioritarianism'. This view faces significant objections. It violates 'ex ante' versions of two plausible principles, the Pigou-Dalton Principle and the Pareto Principle. A second aim is to consider some responses to these objections.

Find out more »
March 2017

Stephan Leuenberger (Glasgow): “Metaphysical defaults”

7 March, 2:00 pm3:30 pm
LAK 2.06, Lakatos Building
London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom
+ Google Map

Abstract: Metaphysical theories face what Frank Jackson termed the “location problem” for any given feature the world: to show that a world fundamentally described by the metaphysical theory in question can contain the feature. Physicalists, for example, need to solve the location problem for minds. According to Jackson, to solve the location problem is to establish a certain entailment claim…

Find out more »
April 2017

Johanna Thoma (LSE): TBC

25 April, 2:00 pm3:30 pm
LAK 2.06, Lakatos Building
London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom
+ Google Map

Abstract: TBC Johanna Thoma is an Assistant Professor in LSE Philosophy, Logic and Scientific Method.   #PopperSeminar

Find out more »
May 2017

Hasok Chang (Cambridge): TBC

9 May, 2:00 pm3:30 pm
LAK 2.06, Lakatos Building
London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom
+ Google Map

Abstract: TBC Hasok Chang is Hans Rausing Professor of History and Philosophy of Science at the University of Cambridge. #PopperSeminar

Find out more »

Jeff McMahan (Oxford): TBC

30 May, 2:00 pm3:30 pm
LAK 2.06, Lakatos Building
London, WC2A 2AE United Kingdom
+ Google Map

Abstract: TBC Jeff McMahan is White’s Professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Oxford.   #PopperSeminar

Find out more »
+ Export Events