Home > News and media > News > News archive > 2005 > Unions march to Perdition: despite having much to offer, all concerned wilfully risk union marginalisation

 

Unions march to Perdition: despite having much to offer, all concerned wilfully risk union marginalisation

Page Contents >

British unions face a painful journey to extinction if they fail to evolve according to David Metcalf, professor of industrial relations and deputy director of the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), in his provocation for The Work Foundation - British Unions: resurgence or Perdition. Equally culpable are employers and Government that currently refuse to contemplate a real partnership approach despite the documented business benefits.

At its peak, UK union membership stood at 13 million in 1979, but haemorrhaged 5.5 million in the subsequent two decades. Presently 29 per cent of employees belong to a union - three in five in the public sector but under one in five in the private sector. Private sector density is likely to be around 12 per cent. The future for private sector unionisation is bleak indeed. Perdition is more likely than resurgence.

It is not surprising that union membership and influence crumbled away in the 1980s and 1990s - unions do not flourish in adversity. The composition of jobs altered such that employment declined in unions' traditional heartlands of manufacturing and the public sector. The state did what it could to undermine collectivism. 

In turn, employers were more likely to oppose unions, such that new recognition became difficult to achieve. Simultaneously many workers lost their taste for membership and the number of 'never members' doubled to half the workforce. Unions' own structures and policies - male, pale and stale - compounded their problems.

The roots of union power - the closed shop and the strike threat - are gone. Evidence suggests that the employer now has less incentive to oppose unions because their impact on productivity and profits is so modest. Equally, the worker has less cause to belong to a union because s/he gets a much reduced wage premium.

The challenge for the union movement is to demonstrate that they can come through for workers without putting employers at a disadvantage and/or deliver for employers while simultaneously looking after worker interests.

Unions have seven million members, but 1.6 million of these are not covered by collective bargaining because, in many cases, the employer abandoned collective bargaining without formally derecognising the union. Unions face a hard task convincing such members that it remains worthwhile to continue to belong to the union. Unions must also service their 5.4 million members who are covered by collective bargaining, the majority of whom are in the public sector.

Since New Labour came to power in 1997, the hostile forces of the 1980s and 1990s have largely evaporated. Public sector employment is rising, the state is at worst neutral in its dealings with unions and has also established, for example, recognition machinery, a national minimum wage and various family friendly initiatives. Almost three million non-union workers say they would be likely to join if there was a union at their workplace. And the union movement generated a raft of initiatives aimed at their revitalization. Despite all this, membership is now the same as it was in 1997 and density has fallen two percentage points.

In the longer run, the new EU Directive on Information and Consultation may be an important influence on unions' futures. It establishes, for the first time, permanent and general arrangements for information and consultation for all workers in the UK in organizations employing more than 50 employees and will cover three quarters of the British labour force by 2007. 

The tough job for unions is to build on these schemes and to maintain and expand their role within them such that they are seen as the legitimate voice representing employees. Although evidence from France and Germany suggests that a union presence complements these arrangements and makes them more effective union density remains low in those countries so perhaps, instead, this indirect voice institution crowds out a union voice.

David Coats, associate director at The Work Foundation said: 'David Metcalf has identified the major challenges facing unions if they are to thrive in the future. Their task must be to make an offer to potential members that is about 'getting on' at work as well as 'getting even'. And unions must appeal to employers too, showing that effective co-operation can deliver big improvements in organisational performance.'

Ends

Notes to editors:

The Work Foundation exists to inspire and deliver improvements to performance through improving the quality of working life. It believes that productive, high performance organisations are those committed to making work more fulfilling, fun, inspirational and effective, and through engaging their workforce succeed in integrating the many aims crucial to organisational success. It is wholly independent and holds not-for-profit and Royal Charter status.

Press copies of British Unions: resurgence or Perdition are available from The Work Foundation press office. This is the first in a series of provocations exploring key issues for work in UK in the coming years.

David Metcalf available for interview.

Further press enquiries, contact Nick Isles/Anne Sampson/Denise Houston at The Work Foundation
Tel: 020 7004 7224/7225 or 07866 734 072, email: asampson@theworkfoundation.com| or dhouston@theworkfoundation.com| 

Press cuttings

The Scotsman
Unions 'facing extinction' unless they change their ways (31 Jan 05)
Trade unions face a 'painful road to extinction' if they fail to evolve, a report has found. David Metcalf, the professor of industrial relations at LSE, said in his study that employers and the government were equally "culpable", because they refused to contemplate a real partnership approach with unions.

31 January 2005

Share:Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn|