|
• In a survey study, 158 dyads of parents and their 9- to 12-year-old children reported the use of television and video games in the family. Data were analysed with a focus on parents’ strategies to regulate media use and how children perceive parental mediation.
• Factor analyses revealed three different strategies of parental mediation. Although these strategies share many aspects with the three forms of parental mediation described in the literature, parents were shown to play a more active role than previously assumed.
• Parents’ restrictive mediation was characterised by rules or restrictions, but also comprised parents explaining that media do not reflect reality. Patronising mediation was found to include elements like shared media consumption and parents commenting on content. Finally, active-emotional co-use reflected parents’ stressing social-emotional aspects in the media (e.g. empathy).
• When analysing factors that predicted the particular form of parental mediation, it was found that parents’ cognitive beliefs largely affected mediation. In particular, fear of negative media effects accompanied both active-emotional co-use and restrictive mediation.
• Not surprisingly, observed differences in parental mediation strategies between media were likely due to parents’ greater familiarity with television compared to video games.
• Remarkably, overall positive ratings of family interactions were associated with children using media less frequently.
• In sum, survey findings reflect the complex interaction of media type, parents’ cognitive beliefs, and family processes, as well as parents’ active role with regard to media use in the family.
|
Relevant publications |
Schaan, V., & Melzer, A. (2012). Parental mediation of children’s television and video game use: Active and embedded in family processes. Manuscript submitted for publication. / Schaan, V. (2010). Mediating outside the box. Drei Mediationsstrategien – zwei Medien – eine Gegenüberstellung aus der Sicht von Eltern und Kindern (Unpublished bachelor dissertation). University of Luxembourg: Luxembourg.
|
Contact details of investigator |
André Melzer, University of Luxembourg, andre.melzer@uni.lu
|