Articles that particularly cite the LSE Identity Project work
| 2010 | Walsham G and Mingers J (2010) Toward ethical information systems: The contribution of discourse ethics. MIS Quarterly 34(4), 833-854. |
this paper noted that “the participation of the LSE in the debate [about identity cards] should surely be welcomed” in terms of the importance of “universalization, and the pursuit of the just, the good, and the practical” |
| 2009 | Froomkin AM (2009) Identity cards and Identity romanticism. In Lessons from the identity trail: Anonymity, privacy and identity in a networked society (Kerr I, Ed), pp 245-263, Oxford University Press, Oxford. |
this paper makes particular reference to the ‘romantic ideal’ of free movement and contrasts this with identity practice in common and civil law worlds. |
| Pieri E (2009) ID cards: A snapshot of the debate in the UK press ESRC National Centre for e-Social Science (23 April) Archived at http://www.ncess.ac.uk/Pieri_idcards_full_report.pdf |
finds the media coverage of the Identity Cards Scheme is presented in a negative light leading to the conclusion that it is perceived to be illiberal and being introduced by stealth, echoing the concerns of the LSE identity project. |
|
| Joinson A (2009) Privacy Concerns, Trust in Government and Attitudes to Identity Cards in the United Kingdom. HICSS, |
this study has compared the LSE alternative proposals with those put forward by the UK Government and a House of Lords Amendment. The study reveals the important role of perceived compulsion, user-centric control and trust in government in affecting support for the identity cards scheme |
|
| Koops B-J, Leenes R, Meints M, Meulen Nvd and Jaquet-Chiffelle D-O (2009) A typology of identity-related crime: Conceptual, technical, and legal issues Information, communication & society 12(1), 1-24. |
draws on LSE Identity Project work on the problems of defining identity-related activities to develop a typology of identity-related crime |
|
| 2008 | Davenport E (2008) Social informatics and sociotechnical research – a view from the UK. Journal of Information Science 34(4), 519-530. |
describes the LSE Identity Project as providing “evidence based input into UK policy-making on Identity Cards”, noting that “The group’s attempts to ‘improve the terms of debate and public discourse’ have required integrity and tenacity at every level of the institution” and highlighting “a process of social learning, by conserving evidence of the interactions that have placed this particular group of academic actors in an authentically critical relationship with government and industry” |
| 2007 | Lyon D (2007) National ID Cards: Crime-control, citizenship and social sorting. Policing 1(1), 111-118. |
notes that LSE report “made a number of constructive proposals as to how an ID card system might be set up in more secure and less contentious ways than the one legislated” (p. 150) |
| Bridgmann T (2007) Reconstituting relevance: Exploring Possibilities for Management Educators’ Critical Engagement with the Public. Management learning 38(4), 519-530. |
describes the LSE Identity Project as an example of critical and engaged activity |
|
| 2006 | Rotenberg M (2006) Real ID, Real Trouble? Communications of the ACM 49, 128-128. |
includes discussion of the LSE Identity Project |
| Guizzo E (2006) Loser: Britain’s Identity Crisis. IEEE spectrum January, |
includes discussion of the LSE Identity Project |
Copyright LSE
Information Systems and Innovation Group, Department of Management 2010