|
Course Contents
|
A great part of public policy decisions are concerned with distributive activities: who gets what. In other words: how do we allocate benefits and burdens of economic activity of a certain society. Naturally there are variant models for this distribution/allocation. Every society is arguably supposed to adhere to one model or another. However, the difference between these models could not be measured in economic terms, which is more or less scientific. They can only be measured in ethical/political terms, or, in the way we see “what is good (public) life.” To compare these models, we have to step outside purely economic field and enter into one that is more “political philosophical.”
Sequence of principal themes:
Week 1: Introduction
Week 2-4: Market-State Approach
Week 4-10: Community-Democracy Approach
Week 11-12: Utilitarianism Approach
|
|
Textbook/Recommended Reading
|
Nozick, Robert, 1974, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books).
Dworkin, Ronald, 2000, Sovereign Virtue (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Sen, Amartya, Choice, Welfare and Measurement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Rawls, John, 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard, MA: Harvard University Press).
Rawls, John, 1993, Political Liberalism (New York: Columbia University Press).
Miller, David, 1989, Market, State, and Community (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Miller, David, 1976, Social Justice (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Cohen, G. A., 1995, Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Equality (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Carens, Joseph, 1981, Equality, Moral Incentives and the Market (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
Kymlicka, Will, 1990, Contemporary Political Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Sen, Amartya, and Bernard Williams (eds.), 1982, Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
|