In 2013/14, 97% of undergraduate leavers and 94% of postgraduate leavers from the Department of Social Policy were in employment, completing further study or taking time out just six months after graduation.
The interdisciplinary nature of social policy means that graduates are equipped with a broad range of knowledge and skills that can be applied in many different settings. Many Social Policy graduates apply their academic training directly working as policy specialists in both the government and NGO sectors.
The high level analytical and research skills developed by Social Policy programmes are also highly valued by employers as diverse as:
The average starting salary of graduates from the Social Policy department in 2013/14 was £22,000 for undergraduates, and £36,400 for postgraduates.
To find out more about LSE graduate destinations by specific Social Policy degree programmes, see graduate destinations by course.
View Department of Social Policy graduate policy.
Sociological skills are valued across a range of occupations both in the private and public sectors, enabling graduates from the Department of Social Policy to find employment in public, commercial or independent organisations concerned with social policy, national or international research institutes, or to proceed to postgraduate courses in social policy and related areas of social science.
Specific skills gained from studying Social Policy at LSE include:
The ability to communicate (both verbally and in writing) complex detail in a lucid and succinct form. Furthermore this involves the ability to listen and engage in debate, offer reasoned arguments and sustain or amend your views in the light of the response of others
Competence in managing large and diverse quantities of information. Ability to organise it in a logical, conceptual and coherent way
Ability to undertake and present research, evaluate evidence and work to a set timeframe
High level analytical skills to critically evaluate and assess research and evidence.
Ability to make balanced judgements on the basis of incomplete and conflicting evidence
To communicate an argument and to evaluate others' arguments and research