The following books by Howard Davies have recently been published:
Global Financial Regulation: The Essential Guide by Howard Davies and David Green. Polity Press, £15.99 ISBN 9780745643502 Times Higher Education review available at: Global Financial Regulation: The Essential Guide
6 November 2007 Judging the Man Booker Prize - what concerns novelists in English today (and what does not) Hong Kong Theatre, LSE Full transcript available: Judging the Man Booker Prize (PDF)
Times Higher Education, 31 July 2008 An Argument for Engagement Howard Davies, Director of LSE, reviews Democracy, by Paul Ginsborg Full article available: An Argument for Engagement
Times Higher Education, 24 April 2008 The quest for a New Deal Howard Davies, Director of LSE, reviews The Conscience of a Liberal: Reclaiming America from the Right, by Paul Krugman Full article available: The quest for a New Deal
Times Higher Education, 21 February 2008 A Patently Provocative Tale Howard Davies, Director of LSE, reviews Sex, Science and Profits: How People Evolved to Make Money, by Terence Kealey Full article available: A Patently Provocative Tale
Times Higher Education, 7 September 2007 Howard Davies, Director of LSE, reviews A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World,by Gregory Clark Industry in the bedroom, productivity in the mills Direct Link - Industry in the bedroom, productivity in the mills
Broadcast media
Howard Davies also appears regularly on broadcast media:
Correspondence on the occupation of the Old Theatre
From Howard Davies, by email, 18 January 2009
I am responding to your email of 17 January.
I have made our position clear in my previous response to you on all the points you raised in the first letter and there is little I can add to that.
I am deeply distressed by the reports of conditions in Gaza. Like Professor Trainor of Universities UK, who speaks for the sector as a whole, I have supported calls for an end to the conflict (as I write it would appear that a ceasefire has been agreed by both sides). As he has said, many of the casualties have occurred in educational establishments. Wherever in the world scholars or their institutions are threatened, or their lives are disrupted by conflict, I believe all parties should respect the integrity of scholarship and intellectual and academic freedom and should work to minimize suffering.
I have made it clear that I am content for my correspondence on the subject to be made public.
I have clarified the situation on the Schools investments, and explained that a further report will be made to Council. I think it important that the School should reach an agreed position on its investment strategy as soon as possible. But it would be quite wrong for me to prejudge the outcome of that process, in which students, academics and lay members of council will be involved. That process, to which the Students' Union has direct access, will in any event consider the issues you have raised.
We have set out the position on scholarships and School support for hardship and I note that you accept that the School cannot legally fund an exclusive scholarship programme based on nationality. We continue actively to seek external funding for scholarships for all students, and especially for those from underrepresented areas. Our fundraising team have met students to discuss possible sources of funding and are prepared to do so again. It may be that the increased focus on the plight of Gaza, which the conflict has brought about, will bring forward new potential donors. The problem is not the shortage of scholarship funds on which we have given assurances; it is as you say the shortage of suitable applicants. If the LSEPSI wish to discuss that in detail with the Academic Registrar and his colleagues, that might be a useful way forward.
We are also pleased to support student initiatives to offer practical medical and humanitarian aid to Palestine. There are also people within the School who can help you with publicity and practical advice on raising funds. These issues, and the question of links with Palestinian universities, can be discussed further as we go forward, perhaps most usefully with the School Secretary Adrian Hall.
We note that your conduct has been peaceful and that lectures have so far been allowed to proceed in the Old Theatre. But, as you will appreciate, the Old Theatre is a central part of our facilities, and we need full access to it as soon as possible. There is a large conference with many external guests on Monday afternoon, followed by a large academic lecture. We saw reports of a plan to hold a rally in the Old Theatre at 4pm on Monday, though we understand that you do not plan to proceed with that. I need to make it clear that a rally in the Old Theatre would not be possible because it would disrupt the academic work of staff and other students. The School is prepared to try to find an alternative venue for the rally if you wish; please contact Conferences & Events as soon as possible on Monday.
As I am sure you understand, the School's prime concern must be to ensure that its educational activities are able to continue as normal. That is what our students have a right to expect. I trust, therefore, that on the basis of what I have set out in these two letters, you will now feel able to end the occupation.
Howard Davies
Director's correspondence on occupation of Old Theatre, 16 January 2009.
Director's correspondence on situation in Gaza, 7 January 2009.