Tamara RelisTamara Relis

Email: t.relis@lse.ac.uk
Room: New Academic Building 6.02
Tel. 020-7955-7253

Dr Tamara Relis is a British Academy Research Fellow in the Law Department of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). She is presently conducting a large-scale three-year empirical study on formal court and informal justice processing of human rights violation cases of violence against women in India. Prior to taking up her present appointment, Dr Relis was the recipient of the Economic and Social Research Council’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Award for 2005/06 in support of the publication and dissemination of her doctoral findings. Dr Relis has also been a research fellow at Columbia University Law School in New York subsequent to having been awarded a Columbia University (Provost’s Office) & LSE Seed Fund Publishing Award relating to a collaborative project with Prof Kendall Thomas (Columbia Law School, Center for Law and Culture) and Prof Simon Roberts (LSE). Previously, Dr Relis taught two LL.B courses in the Law Department. Dr Relis holds a PhD in law from the LSE law department. Her thesis is now a book, published by Cambridge University Press (2009). Dr Relis obtained an LL.M degree with Merit, specialising in procedural law from the LSE (1998) and an LL.B degree in law from the University of London (1995). She is a barrister, with experience in trial court practice (called to the Bar 2002) as well as having qualified as a solicitor (called to the Roll 1998), working primarily in litigation after completion of the College of Law Legal Practice Course with Commendation (1996).

 

Research interests


Won a large 3-year research grant from the British Academy to study how international human rights laws and norms have permeated formal courts and informal justice processing (lok adalats, panchayats, & exported forms of American case management mechanisms) of violence against women cases in South Asia.

WORK-IN-PROGRESS - Drawing upon interdisciplinary scholarship (international relations, law & anthropology, law & development, and victimology literatures), my research questions how the current proliferation of international human rights has shaped case processing systems at grassroots levels. Consequently, I am conducting legal empirical research on international human rights violation cases of violence against women, processed in formal courts and informal justice mechanisms in seven regions of India—comparing these with Western legal and extra-legal processes. Subsequent to several fieldwork trips the dataset consists of over 400 interviews, questionnaires and case hearing observations in 8 languages, covering 7 states. The United Nations Development Program, law school Deans, domestic judges, state legal services authorities, local district and high courts, NGO’s and human rights/public interest lawyers have been involved in the project. Expanding upon my North American findings in my book (2009), I juxtapose legal, lay and gendered actors’ understandings, aims and experiences within the same cases (victims, accused, lawyers, judges, mediators) to provide local perspectives on non-western models of formal courts and informal justice processes as forms of legal pluralism. I examine how, if at all, international human rights laws and norms (e.g. CEDAW 1979, ICCPR 1976, UN Declaration on Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power 1985) have permeated the processing of these cases, comparing how receptive the different spaces of lower courts versus quasi-legal regimes are to claims made from the international sphere. I further examine the theoretical ideas informing these processes (e.g. norm diffusion theory, universalism versus cultural relativism, restorative justice, and feminist critiques of mainstream human rights paradigms) and how these ideas are understood by those on the ground.
    This research is broad-based and covers the areas of international human rights law, criminal law, civil/criminal procedure, lawyer and client studies, comparative law, ADR and gender and the law.

Her broad research areas fall into 3 categories

  • international human rights law and norms and their domestic permeation in formal courts and informal justice mechanisms

  • broader theoretical questions relating to discontinuities inherent in doctrinal and procedural law as compared with how law and legal processes are understood and experienced in different contexts and cultures by state and non-state actors.

  • law and development; legal pluralism

 

Teaching


  • Dr Relis is not presently engaged in teaching as she is in the midst of a three-year fully funded research project. In May 2006 she served as Lecturer and Resource Faculty Member at the Inter-University Centre Dubrovnik, Croatia (through the University of Tubingen, Germany and the University of Zagreb) for the duration of the World Victimology Society 22nd Postgraduate Course on Victimology and Criminal Justice.

Books


Perceptions in Litigation and Mediation: Lawyers, Defendants, Plaintiffs and Gendered Parties, Cambridge University Press (2009)

Perceptions in Litigation and Mediation: Lawyers, Defendants, Plaintiffs and Gendered Parties - coverGrounded in interpretive theory and offering interdisciplinary insights from sociological, psychological, and gender studies, this book addresses the question - How do professional, lay, and gendered actors understand and experience case processing in litigation and mediation? Drawing on data from 131 interviews, questionnaires, and observations of plaintiffs, defendants, lawyers, and mediators involved in 64 fatality and medical injury cases, the book challenges dominant understandings of how formal legal processes and dispute resolution work in practice. In juxtaposing actors’ discourse on all sides of ongoing cases on issues such as expectations, needs, comprehensions of what plaintiffs seek from the legal system, objectives for mediation, and perceptions of what occurs during attempts at case resolution, the findings reveal inherent problems with the core workings of the legal system. By providing in-depth views on the micro-elements of case processing, the book uncovers important issues about formal and informal justice, the inextricability of disputants’ legal and extra-legal needs, and current paradigms relating to professional, lay, and gendered identities.

click here for publisher's site

 

Selected articles / chapters in books


'"It’s Not About The Money!”: A Theory On Misconceptions Of Plaintiffs’ Litigation Aims' 68 (3) University of Pittsburgh Law Review (2007) pp.701-746 

'Consequences Of Power' 12 Harvard Negotiation Law Review (SPRING 2007)  pp.445-501

'Lawyers and Clients: Disparate Conceptions of Dispute Resolution in Litigation-Linked Mediation' in Sociology of Law, Japan Association of the Sociology of Law (JASL) University of Tokyo, October (2004) pp. 24-41

'Disparate Lay and Legal Actor Perceptions of the Meaning and Function of Mediation' (translated to Japanese), Kyoto University Law School Publication, March (2004)

'Civil Litigation from Litigants’ Perspectives: What We Know and What We Don’t Know About the Litigation Experience of Individual Litigants' in 25 Studies in Law, Politics and Society 151-212 (Austin Sarat and Patricia Ewick eds. Elsevier Science, 2002)

 

Law Home Page