Simon Roberts

Email: simon.roberts@lse.ac.uk
Administrative support: Shelly Brindley
Room: New Academic Building 6.02
Tel. 020-7955-7253

Simon Roberts joined LSE as a law student in 1959. Following graduation, he worked at a newly founded law school in Malawi for two years before returning to teach at the School in 1964. Simon has worked here ever since, apart from a period of secondment as Adviser on Customary Law to the Botswana Government (1968-1971). His main teaching and research interests are in the anthropology of law, the law of property and the emergent field of alternative dispute resolution. He has been General Editor of The Modern Law Review (1988-95) and a member of the Lord Chancellor’s Advisory Board on Family Law (1997-2002). He gave the Chorley Lecture in 2004.

 

Research interests


In progress: a long-term study of the changing culture and organisation of large commercial law firms, with Professor Marc Galanter, Centennial Professor at LSE and the University of Wisconsin.

My main current research constitutes an observational study of the settlement procedures at the Mayor's and City of London Court. I have produced Reports on the Mediation Scheme at the Mayor's and City of London Court for the years 2006, 2007 and 2008. A report covering 2009 and 2010 is in preparation.

 

External activities


  • Teaching and Advisory

    - Adviser on Customary Law, Government of Botswana, 1968 70, 1971.
    - Professeur Invite, Faculte de Droit, Universite d'Aix-en-Provence, l990
    - Scientific Committee, European Masters Degree in Mediation, Institut Kurt Bosch, Sion, Switzerland, 1996-2000
    - Lord Chancellors Advisory Board on Family Law, 1997-2002
    - Steering Committee, Mediation Project, Mayor’s and City of London Court, 2006
     

  • Editorial

    - Review Editor, The Modern Law Review
    - Editorial Advisory Board, Journal of Legal Pluralism
    - Editorial Advisory Board, Law in Context
    - Editorial Board, Oxford Socio-Legal Studies Series
    - Editorial Advisory Board, Journal of Comparative Law
    - Advisory Editorial Board, University of Botswana Law Journal

 

Teaching


Books  

(With Michael Palmer) Dispute Processes: ADR and the Primary Forms of Decision Making (Cambridge: CUP, 2nd Ed, 2005)

Dispite Processes - cover

This wide-ranging study considers the primary forms of decision-making - negotiation, mediation, and umpiring - in the context of rapidly changing discourses and practices of civil justice across many jurisdictions. Much contemporary discussion in this field, and associated projects of institutional design, are taking place under the wide ranging but imprecise label of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). If a common linking theme is sought, the authors argue that this must lie in a general shift of priorities as between judgement and settlement in ideological terms. This new edition brings together and analyses a wide range of materials dealing with dispute processes and the current debates on civil justice. With the help of a selection of texts beyond those ordinarily found in the emerging alternative dispute resolution literature it provides a broad, comparative perspective on modes of handling civil disputes, with the principal focus on the central processes of negotiation and mediation.

(With W.T.Murphy and Tatiana Flessas) Understanding Property Law (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 4th Ed, 2004)  

Understanding Property Law provides a background to an area of law which is notoriously inaccessible. Standing back from their subject, the authors of this book elucidate how the practices of the past have shaped the development and form of the modern law. In doing so they stress the role of lawyers in the transactions - such as sale, gift and inheritance - in which their clients become involved. This focus upon the work which lawyers do in their offices provides a necessary complement to the emphasis on legislation and adjudication found in most textbooks.

(With Comaroff J.L.) Rules and Processes: The Cultural Logic of Dispute in an African Context (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981)

Order and Dispute: An Introduction to Legal Anthropology (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1979).

 

Selected articles
and chapters in books
 

‘Listing Concentrates the Mind’: the English Civil Court as an Arena for Structured Negotiation' Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, (2009), pp. 1-23

The dominant image of courts as agencies of trial and judgment has a long history in the common law world. Yet across that region sponsorship of settlement is now widely identified as the courts’ primary responsibility, transforming them into sites where the profoundly different rationalities that ground negotiated agreement increasingly supersede those of rule-based adjudication. This study examines the work of one English court—the Mayor’s and City of London Court—in sponsoring settlement and considers how that role is legitimated on both propositional and symbolic levels. This evolving role raises questions about the Victorian court premises themselves. How are we to regard the now frequently empty courtrooms, designed for trial and judgment and decorated with Gothic elevations linking them symbolically with processes of medieval kingship? Should we simply see this Victorian site of contemporary settlement processes as no more than the quaint residue of a vanished era? Or can these historic features retain potency and relevance at a symbolic level, providing legitimacy for bilateral negotiation rather than the open processes of trial and judgment for which they were originally constructed?

'From kinship to magic circle: the London commercial law firm in the twentieth century' (with Marc Galanter) International Journal of the Legal Profession, Volume 15, Issue 3 November 2008 , pages 143 - 178

The authors trace the successive transformations of the large London commercial law firm, which entered the 20th century as a small group of partners, typically from one or more family groups, surrounded by a large group of working class clerks who performed much of the 'professional work'. After mid-century this firm based on kinship and class hierarchy gave way to a larger firm consisting of non-kin partners selected meritocratically presiding over an increasing band of assistant solicitors and trainees recruited on the basis of their educational credentials and taking part in a promotion-to-partnership tournament. In the last decade of the century, the central institutions and understandings of this meritocratic firm gave way to a constellation of larger, less stable, and increasingly supra-national aggregations, in a setting pervaded by a fascination, both instrumental and narcissistic, with rank and image.

'Order and the Evocation of Heritage' in K. von Benda-Beckmann & F. Pirie (eds) Order & Disorder: Anthropological Perspectives, New York: Berghahn Books, 2007

'After Government? On Representing Law Without the State' (2005) 68 The Modern Law Review 1

For the greater part of the 20th century, representations of law as state law were dominant in the legal scholarship of the West. But over the last thirty years sustained attempts have been made, notably under the self-conscious banner of legal pluralism, to loosen the conceptual bonds between law and government. Early on, acephalous societies in formerly colonial territories and local groupings within the metropolis were represented as legal orders. Latterly, as attention shifted to orderings at regional and global level beyond the nation state, attempts have been made to delineate a general jurisprudence. It is argued here that these conceptual revisions have for the most part been problematic, made in the face of strong evidence linking the cultural assemblage we have come to call law with projects of government. The lecture concludes with a plea that we should be very cautious in representing what are essentially negotiated orders, whether at local or global level, as legal orders; these remain significantly different from those at the level of the state. Today, under an onslaught of jural discourse and institutional design, the distinctive rationalities and values of negotiated order, while arguably deserving to be celebrated, are effectively effaced.

'Against A Systemic Legal History' (2002) 1 Rechtsgeschichte

'Institutionalized Settlement in England: A Contemporary Panorama.' (2002) 10 Willamette Journal of International Law & Dispute Resolution

'Alternative Dispute Resolution and Civil Justice: An Unresolved Relationship' (1993) The Modern Law Review, 452

Law Home Page