Jo Braithwaite

Email J.P.Braithwaite@lse.ac.uk
Administrative support: Gosia Brown
Room: New Academic Building 7.28
Tel. 020-7955-6510

Jo is an associate professor of international commercial finance law, having joined the LSE in September 2008. She has a PhD from the University of London, a LLM degree from the University of Pennsylvania where she was a Thouron scholar and a BA(Hons) from the University of Oxford. She was awarded a Modern Law Review Scholarship during her PhD. Before undertaking her PhD, she qualified as a solicitor and practised in a City law firm. In previous teaching roles, she has taught debt finance, civil litigation, legal methods and writing and public law.

Her current and ongoing research interests relate to the use of private law in the international markets, with a particular focus on the use of standard form contracts.

 
Research Interests
  • Private law dimension to global financial markets

  • OTC derivatives, CCP clearing, EMIR and G20 reforms

  • Empirical research into use of transnational standardised contracts

  • Role of the courts and dispute resolution in the global financial markets

 
External Activities
  • Jo is a qualified solicitor and has been involved in a variety of pro bono activities in the U.K. and U.S.

  • Academic Fellow of the Honourable Society of the Inner Temple

  • She is a member of the SLSA and SLS.


Selected articles
and chapters in books
 

'Law after Lehmans' LSE Law Society and Economy Working Paper Series, 11-2014

The September 2008 collapse of the Lehman Brothers group marked the nadir of the global financial crisis. While the regulatory aftermath has been extensively debated, the effects of the case law that arose from the insolvency have not. This paper explains the need to redress the balance. It starts by considering the quantity and qualities of the Lehmans case law, examining why the 30 plus decisions handed down by the English courts enjoy an unusually high precedent-setting potential. The paper proceeds by analysing the precedential effects of these decisions, and it reports on a recent workshop held at the London School of Economics that met to consider this question. Subject to the event’s terms of engagement, the paper draws out several themes from the discussion, including the impact of the Lehmans cases on the principles of contractual interpretation, the law of trusts and insolvency law. By way of conclusion, it is submitted that the impact of Lehmans case law reaches far beyond that particular insolvency, to worldwide users of standard form documents, the global financial markets and the common law itself. Seen in this light, the Lehmans case law is a significant, but under-appreciated, side-effect of the global financial crisis.

M Bridge and J Braithwaite, 'Private Law and Financial Crises' (2013) 13(2) Journal of Corporate Law Studies 361-399.

Regulation has been at the centre of the financial debate since the global financial crisis, but a full appreciation of the lessons of the crisis also requires account to be taken of private law. This article begins by considering the overlapping functions of private law in the financial markets, including its capacity to address the unprecedented and complex problems that arise during crises and their aftermath. Focusing on the role of property law in insolvency proceedings, we use four case studies to evaluate the wider implications of this function of private law. Our research suggests that the use of private law to manage the fall-out to the recent crisis has come at a price, which is the impact on a number of fundamental legal principles that underpin the markets. We conclude that the continued robustness of private law requires a more proactive approach from various constituencies.

'OTC derivatives, the courts and regulatory reform' Capital Markets Law Journal (2012)

'Standard form contracts as transnational law: Evidence from the derivatives markets' (2012) 75(5) MLR 779-805
[winner of the MLR Wedderburn prize in 2013 (Joint with Dr Kirsty Hughes, University of Cambridge)
see http://www.modernlawreview.co.uk/wedderburn.asp]

This paper uses new research into the derivatives markets to develop our understanding of standard form contracts as transnational law and to show how transnational law theory may be usefully informed by empirical work. Traditionally, it has been assumed that international business communities seek to avoid the courts. However, the paper shows that the national courts play a prominent role in adjudicating disputes involving derivatives. Basing the discussion on the detail of these decisions by the English courts, the paper demonstrates that adjudication does not necessarily undermine widely used standard form contracts, and that it may even reinforce practices that underpin them. This is particularly the case where there is imperfect co‐incidence between a trade association's members and a standard form contract's users. Having explored recent cases, the paper reconciles its findings with a more open and imaginative account of the role of national courts within transnational law theory.

'Private Law and the Public Sector's Central Counterparty Prescription for the Derivatives Markets' LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Paper Series, WPS 02-2011 May 2011

This is a working paper exploring the private law underpinning CCP clearing in the financial markets. It argues that a private law analysis can help to explain the capacity of CCPs as a legal device. It makes particular reference to EU and US regulatory reform in the wake of the crisis, following on from the G20 statements that OTC derivatives should be cleared on CCPs where possible.

'The inherent limits of ‘legal devices’: Lessons for the public sector’s central counterparty prescription for the OTC derivatives markets'
(2011) 12(1) European Business Organization Law Review 87-119.

In the wake of the financial crisis considerable momentum has built up behind proposals to extend central counterparty (CCP) clearing in the over-the-counter derivatives markets. However, implementation is proving complex. This paper argues that one cause of this complexity is that the public sector is seeking to incorporate into legislation (and require the wider use of) a privately owned and operated risk management mechanism. As a matter of law, the paper argues that CCP clearing can be understood as a market-generated ‘legal device’; in other words, one designed to support the markets by means of the interaction of various private law techniques. Following this analysis through, the paper highlights the benefits and drawbacks which derive from the legal techniques underlying CCP clearing (standardisation of contracts, asset-backing, netting and so on) and argues that these qualities are inherent to the device. It concludes that the inherent capacity of CCP clearing gives rise to a qualitatively different set of challenges for policymakers to those arising from technical implementation and it explains that both types of problem need to be addressed if the CCP prescription is to be effective.

'Diversity staff and the dynamics of diversity policymaking in large law firms' Legal Ethics Vol 13(2) (winter 2010) pp 142-162.

A number of high-profile campaigns relating to diversity have focussed on the large law firm sector since the mid-2000s. Reflecting what has been called the ‘diversity approach’ to equality management, they have emphasised voluntary action based on business case reasoning. This paper considers the impact of these campaigns in practice, focusing the dynamics of diversity policy-making within firms. Drawing upon empirical work conducted in large law firms, it explores in particular the perspective of newly appointed diversity staff who have day to day responsibility for diversity policies in the majority of large law firms. It discusses research findings that show while certain policies were being implemented across the large law firm sector, much turned on the position of diversity staff within firms and their ability to conduct in-house negotiations effectively, to compromise and downplay the potential for disruption to the status quo. On the basis of this research I consider the ongoing debates about holding law firms to account with respect to the diversity of their workforce. While the strategy of pressurising firms to disclose ‘diversity data’ seems to gather pace the paper recommends an open discussion about the goals of diversity policy making as a pre-condition of greater accountability.

'The strategic use of demand side diversity pressure on the solicitors' profession.' Journal of Law and Society 37(3) JLS (September 2010) 442-465

There has been a long line of official initiatives seeking to address the poor record of the solicitors' profession on diversity. One of the latest, the Law Society's 2009 Diversity Charter and Protocol, attempts to harness client pressure as a way of bringing about change. The objective of the paper is to assess this strategic use of ‘demand‐side diversity pressure’ in the solicitors' profession, contextualizing the strategy and using different perspectives to assess it. The paper first considers the strategy as a development of ‘business case’ arguments for diversity and explores the implications of scholarly objections to this approach. Secondly, the paper uses empirical data from the City law firm sector to explore the nature and practical effects of demand‐side diversity pressures within law firms. I conclude by considering the prospects of the Law Society's scheme having a meaningful effect, factoring in the possible effects of the ongoing global economic crisis.

'Kenji Yoshino, Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights' (2008) 71(4) Modern Law Review 656