Medical Law : Text, Cases and Materials (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009)
2nd edition

Medical Law : Text, Cases, and Materials offers exactly
what the title says - all of the explanation, commentary, and extracts from
cases and key materials that students need to gain a thorough understanding of
this complex topic. Key case extracts provide the legal context, facts, and
background; extracts from materials, including from the most ground-breaking
writers of today, provide differing ethical perspectives and outline current
debates; and the author's insightful commentary ensures that readers understand
the facts of the cases and can navigate the ethical landscape to form their own
understanding of medical law.
click here for publisher's site
Regulating Autonomy: Sex, Reproduction and the Family -
co-editor, with Fatemeh Ebtehaj, Martin Richards and Shelley Day
Sclater (Hart 2009)
These essays
explore the nature and limits of individual autonomy in law, policy
and the work of regulatory agencies. Authors ask searching questions
about the nature and scope of the regulation of 'private' lives,
from intimacies, personal relationships and domestic lives to
reproduction. They question the extent to which the law does, or
should, protect individual autonomy. Recent rapid advances in the
development of new technologies - particularly those concerned with
human genetics and assisted reproduction - have generated new
questions (practical, social, legal and ethical) about how far the
state should intervene in individual decision making. Is there an
inevitable tension between individual liberty and the common good?
How might a workable balance between the public and the private be
struck? How, indeed, should we think about 'autonomy'?
click here for publisher's site
Regulating Reproduction (Oxford: Hart Publishing 2001)

Provides
a clear and accessible analysis of the various ways in which
human reproduction is regulated. A comprehensive exposition
of the law relating to birth control,abortion, pregnancy,
childbirth, surrogacy and assisted conception is accompanied
by an exploration of some of the complex ethical dilemmas
that emerge when one of the most intimate areas of human
life is subjected to regulatory control. Throughout the
book, two principal themes recur. First, particular emphasis
is placed upon the special difficulties that arise in
regulating new technological intervention in all aspects of
the reproductive process. Second, the concept of
reproductive autonomy is both interrogated and defended.
Winner of the 2002 Society of Legal Scholars’ Annual Prize
for Outstanding Legal Scholarship by a Young Legal Scholar.
click here
for publisher's site
(L. McGoey and E. Jackson)
‘Seroxat and the suppression of clinical trial data: regulatory failure
and the uses of legal ambiguity' Journal of Medical Ethics
2009;35:107-112
This article critically evaluates the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency’s announcement, in March 2008, that GlaxoSmithKline would not face prosecution for deliberately withholding trial data, which revealed not only that Seroxat was ineffective at treating childhood depression but also that it increased the risk of suicidal behaviour in this patient group. The decision not to prosecute followed a four and a half year investigation and was taken on the grounds that the law at the relevant time was insufficiently clear. This article assesses the existence of significant gaps in the duty of candour which had been assumed to exist between drugs companies and the regulator, and reflects upon what this episode tells us about the robustness, or otherwise, of the UK’s regulation of medicines.
click here for full text via
JME [ON
CAMPUS]
click here for full text via
JME [OFF CAMPUS]
'Degendering Reproduction' (2008) Medical Law Review 346-368
'The donation of eggs for research and the rise of neopaternalism' in M Freeman
(ed) Law and Bioethics (Oxford UP: 2008) 499-527
'Secularism, Sanctity and the Wrongness of Killing' (2008) Biosocieties
125-145
This article challenges the idea that there could be a
convincing secular version of the principle that human life is sacred, and
explores the significance this has for the law. A number of secular
justifications for the claim that there is something intrinsically, as opposed
to instrumentally, valuable about human life have been mooted, most eloquently
by Ronald Dworkin. While secular explanations for the sanctity of human life are
undeniably attractive, this article will maintain that they do not have logic on
their side. Having argued that the ‘sanctity principle’ makes sense only as an
article of religious faith, the implications this has for the law are explored.
In relation to end-of-life decision-making, the sanctity principle has been
invoked to justify a sharp line between deliberately ending life and failing to
prolong it. This article will conclude by arguing that a rejection of the
sanctity principle might, in certain circumstances, cause us to focus instead on
the extent to which death harms someone.
click here for full text via
OUP [ON
CAMPUS]
click here for full text via
OUP [OFF CAMPUS]
‘Death, Euthanasia and the Medical
Profession’ in M Johnson, J Herring, B Brooks-Gordon, M Richards
(eds)
Death Rites and Rights (Hart, 2007) 37-55

Death
has diverse religious, social, legal, and medical
aspects and is one of the main areas in which medicine
and the law intersect. In this volume, we ask: What is
the meaning of death in contemporary Britain, and in
other cultures, and how has it changed over time? The
essays in this collection tackle the diverse ways in
which death is now experienced in modern society, in the
process answering a wide variety of questions: How is
death defined by law? Do the dead have legal rights?
What is one allowed to have and not have done to one's
body after death? What are the rights of next of kin in
this respect? What compensation exists for death and how
is death valued? What is happening to the law on
euthanasia and suicide? Is there a human right to die?
What is the principle of sanctity of life? What of
criminal offences against the dead? How are the
traditions of death still played out in religion? How
have customs and traditions of the disposal of bodies
and funerals changed? What happens to donated bodies in
the biomedical setting where anatomical education is
permitted? What processes are employed by police when
investigating suspicious deaths? What of representations
of death? These and other questions are the subject of
this challenging and diverse set of essays.
click here
for publisher's site
‘Prisoners, Their Wives and the Right
to Reproduce’ (2007) Child and Family Law Quarterly 239-246
Does the right to 'found a
family' (Article 12) mean that prisoners and their
partners should be granted access to artificial
insemination facilities? In Dickson v United Kingdom the
European Court of Human Rights, by a majority, decided
that the UK was entitled to restrict prisoners' access
to AI to exceptional cases only. The Dicksons did not
qualify, despite the fact that Mrs Dickson would be too
old to conceive naturally when Mr Dickson was released
from prison. In this note, I explore the Court's
reasoning and challenge some of the assumptions which
underpin the majority's judgment.
click here for access via Lexis
[ON CAMPUS]
click here for access via Lexis [OFF CAMPUS]
[nb. search by article title]
‘Fraudulent Stem Cell Research and
Respect for the Embryo’ (2006) 1(3) Biosocieties 349-56
The purpose of this
article is to comment upon an interesting gap in the
criticism heaped upon Woo Suk Hwang following the
revelation that his apparently groundbreaking stem cell
research involved both the falsification of data and the
unethical recruitment of egg donors. It is, of course,
unsurprising that his fraudulent research and a possible
breach of the Helsinki Declaration have come under
considerable scrutiny. More interesting, in my view, is
that there has been very little interest in the fact
that human embryos may have been pointlessly destroyed.
It is generally believed that research involving human
embryos is legitimate only when it serves an important
scientific purpose. Hwang’s research could serve no
useful scientific purpose, and hence it would be
difficult, if not impossible, to justify the destruction
of embryos. I ask whether the comparative lack of
interest in this aspect of the Korean stem cell research
scandal points to a shift in our attitudes towards the
instrumental use of the early human embryo.
click here for full text via
Cambridge Journals [ON
CAMPUS]
click here for full text via
Cambridge Journals [OFF CAMPUS]
‘Informed Consent and the Impotence of
Tort’ in S. McLean (ed) First Do No Harm (Aldershot,
Ashgate,
2006) 273-86

This
collection brings together essays from leading figures
in the field of medical law and ethics which address the
key issues currently challenging scholars in the field.
It has also been compiled as a lasting testimony to the
work of one of the most eminent scholars in the area,
Professor Ken Mason. The collection marks the academic
crowning of a career which has laid one of the
foundation stones of an entire discipline. The
wide-ranging contents and the standing of the
contributors mean that the volume will be an invaluable
resource for anyone studying or working in medical law
or medical ethics.
click here
for publisher's site
‘Rethinking the Preconception Welfare
Principle’ in K Horsey and H Biggs (eds) Human Fertilisation and
Embryology: Reproducing Regulation (Routledge Cavendish, 2006)
47-67
Relevant
to students, academics and practitioners across the globe,
this original volume highlights contemporary issues
associated with assisted reproduction and embryology and
critically analyzes the law surrounding human reproduction
in the light of case law and technological developments
since the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act (HFE Act)
Act was passed in 1990. Tackling issues from an
interdisciplinary perspective, the authors identify and
evaluate areas that have provoked intense public and
academic debate as well as those where further or renewed
regulation is needed. Focusing primarily on the legal and
ethical issues involved in regulating this area in the UK,
which is at the forefront of developing legislation in this
area, this book has international relevance as many
countries have used the UK as a model for their own
legislation. This text is suitable for a broad range of
readers, including legal academics, law students and
practitioners interested in the areas of medical/healthcare
law and ethics, bioethics and moral philosophy, family law,
sociology and reproductive medicine and genetics.
click here
for publisher's site
‘What is a Parent’ in K O’Donovan and
A Diduck (eds) Feminist Perspectives on Family Law (Routledge
Cavendish, 2006) 59-74
Examining
specific areas of family law from a feminist perspective,
this book assesses the impact that feminism has had upon
family law. It is deliberately broad in scope, as it takes
the view that family law cannot be defined in a traditional
way. In addition to issues of long-standing concern for
feminists, it explores issues of current legal and political
preoccupation such as civil partnerships, home-sharing,
reproductive technologies and new initiatives in regulating
family practices through criminal law, including domestic
violence and youth justice.
click here
for publisher's site
‘Whose Death is it Anyway? Euthanasia
and the Medical Profession’ (2004) 57 Current Legal Problems
415-442
(with Nicola Lacey) ‘Introducing
Feminist Legal Theory’ in J Penner, D Schiff and R Nobles (eds)
Introduction to urisprudence and Legal Theory: Commentary and
Materials (Butterworths, 2002) 779-853
This book provides an
accessible introduction to jurisprudence and legal theory.
It sets out a course of study that offers a highly effective
series of introductions into a wide variety of theories and
theoretical perspectives, from traditional approaches such
as Natural Law to modern ones such as Feminist Theory,
Economic Analysis of Law and Foucault and Law,
click here
for publisher's site
(with Ellie Lee) ‘ The Pregnant Body’
chapter in Ellie Lee and Mary Boyle (eds) Real Bodies
(Palgrave, 2002) 115-132

This
introductory text sets out to make the links between
sociological theories of the body and actual human
behaviour and experience. It covers a broad range of
topics, from long-standing sociological concerns to more
contemporary issues. With a focus on the changeability
of the body, it examines the part that bodies play in
the social construction of categories such as race,
sexuality and disability and explores how we express
ourselves through our bodies, whether in eating, dress
or pain. It also debates how the body is regulated, both
through the life course and in reproduction.
click here
for publisher's site
'Abortion: Medical Paternalism or
Patient Autonomy?’ in Abortion: Whose Right? (Hodder and
Stoughton, 2002) 1-15
‘Conception and the Irrelevance of the
Welfare Principle’ (2002) 65 Modern Law Review 176-203
This article challenges
the assumption that their future children's welfare is a
relevant consideration when deciding whether to provide
a person with assisted conception services. It does not
argue that infertility treatment ought to be available
as of right. Rather, this article's proposal is that
section 13(5) - which specifies that no-one shall
receive assistance with conception unless account has
first been taken of the welfare of any child who might
be born - should be deleted from the Human Fertilisation
and Embryology Act 1990. Extending the 'welfare
principle' to decisions taken prior to a child's
conception is shown to be unjust, meaningless and
inconsistent with existing legal principle.
click here for full text via Swetwise [ON
CAMPUS]
click here for full text via Swetwise [OFF CAMPUS]