Home > British Journal of Sociology > Past volumes > Volume 51 > Compromising positions: emergent neo-Fordisms and embedded gender contracts

 

Compromising positions: emergent neo-Fordisms and embedded gender contracts

The British Journal of Sociology
Volume 51 No. 2 June 2000
pages 235-54

Abstract

This paper adopts a regulation framework to chart the emergence of neo-Fordism as a flexible accumulation regime and mode of social regulation. Neo-Fordism relies on old Fordist principles as well as incorporating new models of emergent post-Fordisms; old and new social relationships, in their particular combination, specify the trajectory of national variants. I argue that Fordist bargains institutionalized the terms of a compromise between labour, capital and the state. These bargains embedded a male-breadwinner gender contract compromising women's positions and standardardizing employment contracts around the needs, interests and authority of men. A focus on compromises and contracts makes visible the differentiated gender effects of work transformation in each country.

Keywords: Fordism, Gender, Welfare state, part-time work, gender contract

Heidi Gottfried
College of Urban, Labor and Metropolitan Affairs
Wayne State University

(Link to full paper|)

Share:Facebook|Twitter|LinkedIn|